USING SPAD 502 PLUS TESTER TO DIAGNOSE CHLOROPHYLL PIGMENT CONTENT IN SPRING WHEAT LEAVES

УДК: 633.111:631.527:581.132 DOI: 10.31588/2073-0462-2026-21-2-22-28 EDN: CSLONA

Authors

  • Lyudmila Vladislavovna Volkova Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the North-East named after N.V. Rudnitskiy (166a Lenin St., Kirov, 610007, Russian Federation) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0837-8425

Keywords:

spring wheat (Triticum aestivum), breeding, varieties, hybrid combinations, pigments, photosynthesis, correlation

Abstract

The study was conducted to explore the potential of using the Konica Minolta SPAD 502 Plus contact tester (Japan) to assess photosynthetic pigment content in wheat leaves and to isolate material for breeding. The study was conducted in 2022–2023 in Kirov region. To verify the tester's accuracy, pigment complex composition was analyzed simultaneously using a UVmini-1240 spectrophotometer (Japan). The study subjects included 8 parental varieties and 36 hybrid combinations of the third and fourth generations at the flowering and milky-wax ripeness stages. The values of SPAD 502 Plus tester are characterized by high intervarietal variability (15.4...51.2 device units) with significant genotypic differences (НСР05=4.6...9.3). The manifestation of the trait is distinguished by high varietal specificity in terms of the level of indicator decrease from the flowering phase to milky-wax ripeness (from -3.9 to 56.3%) and is influenced by seasonal effects. A highly significant agreement (r=0.70...0.81) was established between the readings of two compared devices, as well as the possibility of predicting the content of the sum of chlorophyll pigments (Chl a+b) in leaves based on tester measurements (R2=0.82...0.85). The results of paired correlation analysis revealed a significant correspondence between the ranks of genotypes, estimated by the average values by two different methods (rg=0.71...0.77). As a result of research, 10 best hybrid combinations and 3 parental varieties were selected. The hybrid combination Darya x Egisar 29, characterized by a high SPAD 502 Plus value and minimal decline during development, is considered the most promising for breeding. Epos, Darya and Egisar 29 varieties are recommended for inclusion in breeding programs as parental forms due to their high photosynthetic activity. Using SPAD 502 Plus tester allows for rapid assessment of breeding material for chlorophyll pigment content in the field with acceptable accuracy.

Author Biography

Lyudmila Vladislavovna Volkova , Federal Agrarian Scientific Center of the North-East named after N.V. Rudnitskiy (166a Lenin St., Kirov, 610007, Russian Federation)

Ph.D. of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher of Spring Wheat Breeding Laboratory

References

 1. Процесс фотосинтеза и урожайность перспективных сортов озимой мягкой пшеницы при разных уровнях азотного и фосфорного питания в условиях орошения / Ф. М. Казиметова, Н. Р. Магомедов, А. А. Абдуллаев и др. // Зерновое хозяйство России. 2025. Т. 17, № 5. С. 76–82. doi: 10.31367/2079-8725-2025-100-5-76-82.

 2. Priadkina H. A. Pigments, efficiency of photosynthesis and winter wheat productivity // Plant Varieties Studying and Protection. 2018. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 97–108. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.14.1.2018.126524.

 3. Kendal E. Relationship between chlorophyll and other features in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) using SPAD and biplot analyses // Journal Agricultural Science and Technology. 2015. Vol. 17. No. 7. P. 1873–1886.

 4. Ерошенко Ф. В., Сторчак И. Г., Чернова И. В. Оценка состояния растений методами экспресс-диагностики // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2019. № 7 (186). С. 19–25. doi: 10.32417/article_5d52af440f71b8.16701399.

 5. Щуклина О. А., Афанасьев Р.А. Применение фотометрических приборов для экспресс-диагностики азотного питания сельскохозяйственных растений в ранние фазы вегетации // Агрохимический вестник. 2022. № 2. С. 73–77. doi: 10.24412/1029-2551-2022-2-014.

 6. Калинина А. В., Лящева С. В. Состав и содержание пигментов фотосинтеза в листьях проростков озимой мягкой пшеницы // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2018. Т. 20. № 2 (2). С. 286–290.

 7. Волкова Л. В., Лисицын Е. М., Амунова О. С. Роль генотипа и погодно-климатических условий в формировании морфобиологических и хозяйственно ценных признаков яровой мягкой пшеницы // Таврический вестник аграрной науки. 2020. № 3 (23). С. 43–58. doi: 10.33952/2542-0720-2020-3-23-43-58.

 8. Лепехов С. Б. Методы подбора пар для скрещивания в селекции на урожайность у самоопыляющихся культур // Труды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекции. 2017. Т. 178. № 4. С. 76–89. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2017-4-76-89.

 9. Лиховидова В. А., Газе В. Л., Ионова Е. В. Влияние фотосинтетического пигмента хлорофилла при различной влагообеспеченности на продуктивность растений озимой мягкой пшеницы // Аграрная наука. 2020. № 7-8. С. 86–89. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2020-340-7-86-89.

 10. Хлесткина Е. К. Стратегия новой «зеленой революции» в селекции пшеницы: к юбилею академика РАН Людмилы Андреевны Беспаловой // Труды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекции. 2022. Т. 183. №1. С. 254–258. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2022-1-254-258.

 11. Lichtenthaler, H. K., Buschmann, C. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Measurement and Characterization by UV-VIS Spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry. 2001. Vol. 1. n. pag. URL: https://www.jkipit.kit.edu/molbio/download/425%20Lichtenthaler%20und%20Buschmann%202001%20Chl%20determ%20CurrProtFoodAnalChem%204-3-1.pdf (дата обращения: 02.02.2026).

 12. Доспехов Б. А. Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований): учебное пособие. 5-е изд., доп. и перераб. М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. 351 с.

 1. Kazimetova FM, Magomedov NR, Abdullaev AA. [The process of photosynthesis and productivity of promising varieties of winter soft wheat at different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition under irrigation]. Zernovoe khozyaystvo Rossii. 2025; Vol.17. 5. 76-82 p. doi: 10.31367/2079-8725-2025-100-5-76-82.

 2. Priadkina HA. Pigments, efficiency of photosynthesis and winter wheat productivity. Plant varieties studying and protection. 2018; Vol.14. No.1. 97-108 p. doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.14.1.2018.126524.

 3. Kendal E. Relationship between chlorophyll and other features in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) using SPAD and biplot analyses. Journal Agricultural Science and Technology. 2015; Vol.17. No.7. 1873-1886 p.

 4. Eroshenko FV, Storchak IG, Chernova IV. [Assessing of plant condition using express-diagnostic methods]. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2019; 7 (186). 19-25 p. doi: 10.32417/article_5d52af440f71b8.16701399.

 5. Shchuklina OA, Afanasev RA. [Application of photometric devices for express diagnostics of nitrogen nutrition of agricultural plants in the early stages of vegetation]. Agrokhimicheskiy vestnik. 2022; 2. 73-77 p. doi: 10.24412/1029-2551-2022-2-014.

 6. Kalinina AV, Lyashcheva SV. [Composition and content of photosynthetic pigments in leaves of winter soft wheat seedlings]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2018; Vol.20. 2(2). 286-290p.

 7. Volkova LV, Lisitsyn EM, Amunova OS. [The role of genotype and weather-climatic conditions in the formation of morphobiological and economically valuable traits of spring soft wheat]. Tavricheskiy vestnik agrarnoy nauki. 2020; 3 (23). 43-58 p. doi: 10.33952/2542-0720-2020-3-23-43-58.

 8. Lepekhov SB. [Methods for selecting parental pairs for crossing in breeding for self-pollinating crops productivity]. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii. 2017; Vol.178. 4. 76-89 p. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2017-4-76-89.

 9. Likhovidova VA, Gaze VL, Ionova EV. [Influence of photosynthetic chlorophyll pigment under different moisture conditions on productivity of winter soft wheat plants]. Agrarnaya nauka. 2020; 7-8. 86-89 p. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2020-340-7-86-89.

 10. Khlestkina EK. [Strategy of new "green revolution" in wheat breeding: on the anniversary of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Lyudmila Andreevna Bespalova]. Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selektsii. 2022; Vol.183. 1. 254-258 p. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2022-1-254-258.

 11. Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. [Internet]. Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. 2001; Vol.1. n. pag. [cited 2026, February 2]. Available from: https://www.jkip.kit.edu/molbio/download/425%20Lichtenthaler%20und%20Buschmann%202001%20Chl%20determ%20CurrProtFoodAnalChem%204-3-1.pdf.

 12. Dospekhov BA. Metodika polevogo opyta (s osnovami statisticheskoy obrabotki rezultatov issledovaniy): uchebnoe posobie. 5-e izd., dop. i pererab. [Field experiment methodology (with fundamentals of statistical processing of research results): a tutorial, 5th edition, supplemented and revised]. Moscow: Agropromizdat. 1985; 351p.

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

Volkova . Л. В. . (2026). USING SPAD 502 PLUS TESTER TO DIAGNOSE CHLOROPHYLL PIGMENT CONTENT IN SPRING WHEAT LEAVES: УДК: 633.111:631.527:581.132 DOI: 10.31588/2073-0462-2026-21-2-22-28 EDN: CSLONA. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 21(2). Retrieved from https://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/380