КАЧЕСТВО ЗЕРНА СОРТОВ ОЗИМОЙ МЯГКОЙ ПШЕНИЦЫ СЕЛЕКЦИИ САМАРСКОГО НИИСХ В СТЕПНОМ ЗАВОЛЖЬЕ

DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2025-20-4-70-76 УДК 633.111.1:[631.524.7:631.576.331.2]

Authors

  • Elena Nikolaevna Shabolkina Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.
  • Dmitriy Olegovich Dolzhenko Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.
  • Nadezhda Eduardovna Dolzhenko Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.
  • Natalya Vladimirovna Anisimkina Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.

Keywords:

winter common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), variety, grain quality, protein, rheological properties, baking properties, falling number.

Abstract

The study was conducted to evaluate the main grain quality indicators of winter common wheat varieties in the steppe Trans-Volga region and to establish correlations between them. The work was carried out from 2022 to 2024 on ordinary chernozem soil in Samara region, using 12 winter common wheat varieties sown on complete fallow, as part of a competitive variety trial. Agrometeorological conditions in 2022 were characterized by favorable moisture, while drought of varying intensity was observed in 2023 and 2024. The protein content in the grain, the volume of bread, the overall baking score and especially the falling number depended mainly on the genotype (share of the factor influence was 36.3...52.6%), while the rheological properties of the dough depended to a greater extent on the annual conditions (35.2...52.4%). Based on the protein content in the grain and the valorimetric value, most of the studied varieties can be classified as good fillers. Bezenchukskaya 380 (13.5%) and Vyuga (13.1%) met the requirements for valuable wheat in terms of protein content, while Alternativa, Skirda and Vyuga (58...65 unit of valorimeter) met the requirements. The maximum values of the key quality indicator for winter wheat, the “falling number” were observed in varities: Estafeta, Vyuga and Integratsiya (336–363 sec). Based on a set of quality characteristics a new short-stemmed variety of winter soft wheat - Vyuga, was distinguished. Based on the correlation analysis data, criteria for assessing the baking quality of common wheat have been proposed, including dough stability index according Brabender farinograph and grain protein content. The latter may be useful in years with favorable hydrothermal conditions during the winter wheat growing season, when the greatest differentiation in grain protein content occurs among varieties.

Information about the authors

Elena Nikolaevna Shabolkina, Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences (PhD in Agriculture), Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Technological and Analytical Service

Dmitriy Olegovich Dolzhenko, Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.

 Candidate of Agricultural Sciences (PhD in Agriculture), Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Breeding and Genetics of Soft Wheat

Nadezhda Eduardovna Dolzhenko, Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.

Junior Researcher of the Laboratory of Breeding and Genetics of Soft Wheat

Natalya Vladimirovna Anisimkina, Samara Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Samara Research Institute of Agriculture named after N.M. Tulaykov, Bezenchuk Urban-Type Settlement, Samara Oblast, Russia.

Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Technological and Analytical Service

References

 1. Реализация генетического потенциала сортов мягкой пшеницы под влиянием условий внешней среды: современные возможности улучшения качества зерна и хлебопекарной продукции / Е. К. Хлесткина, Е. В. Журавлева, Т. А. Пшеничникова и др. // Сельскохозяйственная биология. 2017. Т. 52. No 3. С. 501–514. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.3.501rus.

 2. Изучение реологических и физических свойств теста сортов озимой пшеницы / Н. С. Кравченко, Д. М. Марченко, О. А. Некрасова и др. // Зерновое хозяйство России. 2021. No 6 (78). С. 45–52. doi 10.31367/2079872520217864552.

 3. This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license / S. M. Dashkevich, M. U. Utebayev, O. O. Kradetskaya, et al. // OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022. Vol. 22. No. 3. P.347–355. doi: 10.3844/ojbsci.2022.347.355.

 4. Late‑maturity α‑amylase (LMA): exploring the underlying mechanisms and end‑use quality effects in wheat / A. E. Cannon, E. J. Marston, A. M. Kiszonas, et al. // Planta. 2022. Vol. 255. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00425-021-03749-3 (дата обращения: 03.11.2025). doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03749-3.

 5. LMA or vivipary? Wheat grain can germinate precociously during grain maturation under the cool conditions used to induce late maturity alpha-amylase (LMA) / P. S. Peery, S. U. Carle, M. Wysock, et al. // Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023. Vol. 14. 1156784. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1156784/full (дата обращения: 03.11.2025). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1156784.

 6. Крупнов В. А., Крупнова О. В. Подходы по улучшению качества зерна пшеницы: селекция на число падения // Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции. 2015. Т. 19, No 5. С. 604–612. doi: 10.18699/VJ15.077.

 7. Биохимическая, генетическая и цифровая оценка зерна сортов озимой мягкой пшеницы с различным индексом прорастания / А. В. Федяева, С. Д. Афонникова, Д. А. Афонников и др. // Физиология растений. 2024. Т. 71. No 2. С. 205–215. doi: 10.31857/S0015330324020072.

 8. Гурьева К. Б., Белецкий С. Л., Хаба Н. А. Методологические подходы к комплексной оценке качества и хлебопекарных характеристик пшеницы при хранении // Пищевая промышленность. 2021. No 5. С. 24–27. doi: 10.52653/PPI.2021.5.5.005.

 9. Методика государственного сортоиспытания. Технологическая оценка зерновых, крупяных и зернобобовых культур. М.: Колос, 1988. 121 с.

 10. Доспехов Б. А. Методика полевого опыта. М.: Альянс, 2014. 351 с.

 11. Шаболкина Е. Н. Разработка методов оценки зерна тритикале по хлебопекарным свойствам // Известия Оренбургского государственного аграрного университета. 2010. No 4 (28). С. 33–34.

 12. Современная оценка хлебопекарных свойств российской пшеницы / Е. П. Мелешкина, С. Н. Коломиец, Н. С. Жильцова и др. // Вестник Воронежского государственного университета инженерных технологий. 2021. Т. 83. No 1. С. 155–162. doi: 10.20914/2310-1202-2021-1-155-162

 1. Khlestkina EK, Zhuravleva EV, Pshenichnikova TA. [Realization of genetic potential of soft wheat varieties under the influence of environmental conditions: modern possibilities for improving quality of grain and bakery products]. Selskokhozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2017; Vol.52. 3. 501-514 p. doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.3.501rus.

 2. Kravchenko NS, Marchenko DM, Nekrasova OA. [Study of rheological and physical properties of the dough of winter wheat varieties]. Zernovoe khozyaystvo Rossii. 2021; 6 (78). 45-52 p. doi 10.31367/2079872520217864552.

 3. Dashkevich SM, Utebayev MU, Kradetskaya OO. This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022; Vol.22. No.3. 347-355 p. doi: 10.3844/ojbsci.2022.347.355.

 4. Cannon AE, Marston EJ, Kiszonas AM. Late‑maturity α‑amylase (LMA): exploring the underlying mechanisms and end‑use quality effects in wheat. [Internet]. Planta. 2022; Vol.255. [cited 2025, November 03]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00425-021-03749-3. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03749-3.

 5. Peery PS, Carle SU, Wysock M. LMA or vivipary? Wheat grain can germinate precociously during grain maturation under the cool conditions used to induce late maturity alpha-amylase (LMA). [Internet]. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023; Vol.14. 1156784. [cited 2025, November 03]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1156784/full. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1156784.

 6. Krupnov VA, Krupnova OV. [Approaches to improving the quality of wheat grain: breeding for falling number]. Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selektsii. 2015; Vol.19. 5. 604-612 p. doi: 10.18699/VJ15.077.

 7. Fedyaeva AV, Afonnikova SD, Afonnikov DA. [Biochemical, genetic and digital evaluation of grain of winter soft wheat varieties with different germination indices]. Fiziologiya rasteniy. 2024; Vol.71. 2. 205-215 p. doi: 10.31857/S0015330324020072.

 8. Gureva KB, Beletskiy SL, Khaba NA. [Methodological approaches to a comprehensive quality assessment and baking characteristics of wheat during storage]. Pishchevaya promyshlennost. 2021; 5. 24-27 p. doi: 10.52653/PPI.2021.5.5.005.

 9. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya. Tekhnologicheskaya otsenka zernovykh, krupyanykh i zernobobovykh kultur. [State variety testing methodology. Technological evaluation of grain, cereal and leguminous crops]. Moscow: Kolos. 1988; 121 p.

 10. Dospekhov BA. Metodika polevogo opyta. [Field experiment methodology]. Moscow: Alyans. 2014; 351 p.

 11. Shabolkina EN. [Development of methods of triticale wheat grain evaluation according to its bread-baking properties]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2010; 4 (28). 33-34 p.

 12. Meleshkina EP, Kolomiets SN, Zhiltsova NS. [Modern assessment of baking properties of Russian wheat]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologiy. 2021; Vol.83. 1. 155-162 p. doi: 10.20914/2310-1202-2021-1-155-162

Downloads

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Shabolkina Е. Н., Dolzhenko Д. . О., Dolzhenko Н. Э., & Anisimkina Н. В. (2026). КАЧЕСТВО ЗЕРНА СОРТОВ ОЗИМОЙ МЯГКОЙ ПШЕНИЦЫ СЕЛЕКЦИИ САМАРСКОГО НИИСХ В СТЕПНОМ ЗАВОЛЖЬЕ: DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2025-20-4-70-76 УДК 633.111.1:[631.524.7:631.576.331.2]. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 20(4). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/43

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): Vestnik Kazan SAU № 4 (80) 2025

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).