AGROBIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF A GROUP OF TECHNICAL GRAPE VARIETIES IN BLACK SEA AGROECOLOGICAL ZONE OF KRASNODAR KRAI
DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2025-20-4-52-57 УДК 634.863
Keywords:
grapes (Vitis L.), technical varieties, phenology, agrobiology, yield, harvest conditions.Abstract
The study was conducted with the aim to examine the agrobiological characteristics of a group of locally bred technical grape varieties (Dostoinyy, Kaberne AZOS, Krasnostop AZOS, Kubanets), obtained as a result of crosses of high-quality grape varieties with the Phylloxera-resistant Dzhemete variety, in the Black Sea agroecological zone of Krasnodar Krai. The study was conducted at Anapa ampelographic collection using standard methods. The duration of phenological period from the beginning of budding phases to the beginning of flowering was reduced for all varieties in 2024 compared to 2022-2023 and was minimal in the experiment for Kaberne AZOS and Krasnostop AZOS (43 days). Based on the results for 2022-2024, Kaberne AZOS, Krasnostop AZOS and Dostoynyy were classified as mid-season ripening, while Kubanets and Kaberne Sauvignon (control) were classified as late-ripening varieties. The highest number of blossomed and fruiting shoots was recorded for Dostoynyy – 89-94% and 87-92%, respectively. The coefficients fruiting and fruitfulness for all studied varieties exceeded 1.0 excepted Kaberne AZOS variety. The highest yields in the trial were observed for Kubanets and Dostoynyy varieties – 13.0 kg/plant and 12.6 kg/plant, respectively. Dostoynyy (3.2-3.9) and Kaberne AZOS (3.5-3.7) varieties demonstrated optimal glucoacetometric conditions for dry wine production in 2022-2023, while the control variety did so in 2024. Kubanets (3.7) must conditions were optimal for dry wine production only in 2022; in the remaining years, they, like the Krasnostop AZOS variety throughout the study period, met the parameters suitable for dessert wines.
References
1. Катрюхин Б. А., Шелудько О. Н. Современное состояние виноделия в России: основные аспекты на примере Краснодарского края // Промышленная политика в Российской Федерации. 2025. No 1-3. С. 2–6.
2. Лукьянов А. А. Итоги научной деятельности Анапской зональной опытной станции виноградарства и виноделия – филиала Федерального государственного бюджетного научного учреждения «Северо-Кавказский федеральный научный центр садоводства, виноградарства, виноделия» за 2023 год // Плодоводство и виноградарство Юга России. 2024. No 85 (1). С. 46–58. doi: 10.30679/2219-5335-2024-1-85-46-58.
3. Автохтоны, аборигены и аллохтоны в российском виноделии / Е. А. Егоров, И. А. Ильина, Н. М. Агеева и др. // Известия высших учебных заведений. Пищевая технология. 2025. No 1 (399). С. 11–20. doi: 10.26297/0579-3009.2025.1.1.
4. Казахмедов Р. Э. Технология восстановления угнетенных филлоксерой корнесобственных растений винограда // Аграрная наука. 2025. No 2. С. 138–144. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2025-391-02-138-144.
5. Resistance of Grapevine Genotypes (Vitis spp.) to Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) in Brazil: Implications for Pest Management / S. Andzeiewski, D. C. Oliveira, D. Bernardi, et al. // Environmental Entomology. 2022. Vol. 51. No. 6. P. 1166–1171. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvac074.
6. Modern methods of Phylloxera-resistant Rootstock Vine growth and formation / L. Shavadze, M. Kevlishvili, M. Gagolishvili, et al. // International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research. 2022. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 49–56. doi: 10.21744/irjeis.v8n3.2086.
7. Дергунов А. В., Курденкова Е. К. Влияние культуры ведения винограда и агротехнических приёмов на его урожайность и качество вина // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. 2021. Т. 16. No 2 (62). С. 11–15. doi: 10.12737/2073-0462-2021-11-15.
8. Instrumental assessment of the formation of the elemental composition of wines with various bentonite clays / Z. Temerdashev, A. Abakumov, M. Bolshov, et al. // Microchemical Journal. 2022. Vol. 175. P. 107145. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/29/10/2251 (дата обращения 15.05.2025). doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.107145.
9. Сидоров А., Юдич Ю. VII «Всероссийский саммит – 2017» в Абрау-Дюрсо. Подведение итогов и взгляд в будущее // Виноделие и виноградарство. 2017. No 5. С. 39–40.
10. Петров В. С., Алейникова Г. Ю., Марморштейн А. А. Методы исследований в виноградарстве. Краснодар: ФГБНУ СКФНЦСВВ, 2021. 147 с. ISBN 978-5-98272-139-6.
11. Лазаревский М. А. Изучение сортов винограда. Ростов-на-Дону: издательство Ростовского университета, 1963. 150 с.
1. Katryukhin BA, Sheludko ON. [Modern state of winemaking in Russia: main aspects using Krasnodar Krai as an example]. Promyshlennaya politika v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2025; 1-3. 2-6 p.
2. Lukyanov AA. [Results of scientific activities of Anapa Zonal Experimental Station of Viticulture and Winemaking – a branch of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "North Caucasus Federal Scientific Center for Horticulture, Viticulture and Winemaking" for 2023]. Plodovodstvo i vinogradarstvo Yuga Rossii. 2024; 85 (1). 46-58 p. doi: 10.30679/2219-5335-2024-1-85-46-58.
3. Egorov EA, Ilina IA, Ageeva NM. [Autochthons, aborigines and allochthons in Russian winemaking]. Pishchevaya tekhnologiya. 2025. No 1 (399). S. 11–20. doi: 10.26297/0579-3009.2025.1.1.
4. Kazakhmedov RE. [Technology for restoring rootstocks of grape plants oppressed by phylloxera]. Agrarnaya nauka. 2025; 2. 138-144 p. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2025-391-02-138-144.
5. Andzeiewski S, Oliveira DC, Bernardi D. Resistance of grapevine genotypes (Vitis spp.)to Daktulosphaira vitifoliae (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae) in Brazil: Implications for pest management. Environmental Entomology. 2022; Vol.51. No.6. 1166-1171 p. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvac074.
6. Shavadze L, Kevlishvili M, Gagolishvili M. Modern methods of Phylloxera-resistant rootstock vine growth and formation. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT and Scientific Research. 2022; Vol.8. No.3. 49-56 p. doi: 10.21744/irjeis.v8n3.2086.
7. Dergunov AV, Kurdenkova EK. [Influence of grape growing culture and agrotechnical methods on its yield and wine quality]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2021; Vol.16. 2 (62). 11-15 p. doi: 10.12737/2073-0462-2021-11-15.
8. Temerdashev Z, Abakumov A, Bolshov M. Instrumental assessment of the formation of the elemental composition of wines with various bentonite clays. [Internet]. Microchemical Journal. 2022; Vol.175. 107145 p. [cited 2025, May 15]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/29/10/2251. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2021.107145.
9. Sidorov A, Yudich Yu. [VII All-Russian Summit -2017 in Abrau-Durso. Summarizing and a look to the future]. Vinodelie i vinogradarstvo. 2017; 5. 39-40 p.
10. Petrov VS, Aleynikova GYu, Marmorshteyn AA. Metody issledovaniy v vinogradarstve. [Research methods in viticulture]. Krasnodar: FGBNU SKFNTsSVV. 2021; 147 p. ISBN 978-5-98272-139-6.
11. Lazarevskiy MA. Izuchenie sortov vinograda. [Study of grape varieties]. Rostov-on-Don: izdatelstvo Rostovskogo universiteta. 1963; 150 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
