DECOMPOSITION OF FACTORS OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL-ORIENTED PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-193-201 УДК 332
Keywords:
regionally-oriented production systems, innovative development, neo-industrialization, innovative infrastructure, integration, economic efficiency, digital transformation, technological order.Abstract
The strategic choice of the innovative vector of Russia's development predetermines the strengthening of the role of regionally oriented production systems (ROPS) in the context of their consistent integration into the trends of neo-industrial technological concepts "Industry 4.0" and "APK 4.0", digitalization of the economy, the introduction of innovative solutions of the sixth technological order, the integration of science and production. Currently, only 12% of Russian regions (the leading group) are fully included in the innovation agenda. It is rather difficult to strategize innovative changes within a large country, since the regions are largely differentiated in the context of social and economic development, innovative activity, and the state of scientific and technological potential. The ability of each region to designate its own "window of opportunity" in priority activities, taking into account the imperatives of neo-industrial development, is especially in demand, as it will make innovation processes more manageable. This is especially important in the context of the tightening of sanctions restrictions and the actualization of the request to achieve sustainable technological sovereignty of Russia. The goal of decomposition of the factors of innovative development of ROPS implemented in the study is, in fact, a key preparatory stage for an integrated approach to the subsequent development of regional innovation strategies. The three-level hierarchization of factors and their substantiation by subject areas in the methodological aspect is universal both for local ROPS and for regional control systems. A detailed study of the indicated factors is the starting point for positioning the innovative profile of the ROPS and directly affects the effectiveness of the implementation of innovative scenarios in industries and the agro-industrial complex. The formation of a comprehensive understanding of the innovation situation in the regions contributes to focusing efforts on stimulating the innovation activity of the ROPS, taking into account regional specifics, which fully corresponds to the goal-setting of the Concept of Technological Development of Russia until 2030, which is scheduled to be approved this year. In the next three years, the state will allocate about 4 billion rubles to subsidize innovative technological entrepreneurship. 11 federal development institutions and 46 regional corporations of regional and interregional profile are involved in active support of the innovative development of the ROPS.
References
1. Романова О.А., Акбердина В.В., Брянцева О.С. Потенциал старопромышленного региона в условиях неоиндустриальной парадигмы развития // Вестник Забайкальского государственного университета. 2013. № 2 (93). С. 142-152.
2. Толкачев С.А. Индустрия 4.0 и ее влияние на технологические основы технологической безопасности России // Гуманитарные науки. Вестник финансового университета. 2017. T. 7. № 1(25). С. 86-91.
3. Развитие регионально-ориентированных производственных систем / А.В. Овчинникова, А.И. Сутыгина, В.В. Матвеев и др. Екатеринбург-Ижевск: ИЭ УрО РАН, 2021. 230 c.
4. Юленкова И.Б. Факторы инновационного развития региона // Регионология. 2019. Т. 27. № 4(109). С.661-677. doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.109.027.201904.661-677.
5. Zhang Y., Hu P. Analysis on the overall level of regional innovation environment in China // ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2018. P. 159-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3241748.3241771.
6. Porter M. E. The economic performance of regions // Regional Studies. 2003. No. 37. Р. 549-578. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108688.
7. Курбатова, М. В., Левин, С. Н., Каган, Е. С., Кислицын, Д. В. Регионы ресурсного типа в России: определение и классификация // Terra Economicus. 2019. № 17(3). С. 89-106. doi: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-3-89-106.
8. Ефимова Е.Г., Гриценко Д. Роль добывающей промышленности в развитии периферийных арктических регионов России и Канады // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Экономика. 2021. Т. 37. №. 2. С. 241-271. doi:10.21638/spbu05.2021.203.
9. Ресурсные регионы России в «новой реальности» / Крюков В.А., Шмат В.В., Нефедкин В.И. и др. Новосибирск: ИЭОПП СО РАН, 2017. 308 с.
10. Бухвальд Е.М. Институты развития и национальная безопасность Российской Федерации // Развитие и безопасность. 2021. № 1 (9). С. 16-28. doi:10.46960/2713-2633_2021_1_16.
11. Доржиева В.В., Ильина С.А. Сценарий реформирования институтов развития: в поисках смысла и новые аспекты регуляторной политики // Экономика, предпринимательство и право. 2021. Т.11. № 11. С. 2451-2470. doi: 10.18334/epp.11.11.113770.
12. Дорошенко Ю.А., Малыхина И.О., Сомина И.В. Инновационное развитие региона в условиях современных трендов неоиндустриализации // Экономика региона. 2020. Т.16. №. 4. С. 1318-1334. doi: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-21.
13. Сутыгина А.И. Национальная продовольственная независимость в условиях кризиса // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. 2020. № 6. С. 2-6. doi: 10.32651/206-2.
14. Рогулин Р.С. Роль информационно-коммуникационных технологий формировании устойчивых цепочек поставок до и после пандемии Covid-19 // Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2021. T. 20. № 3. С. 461-488. doi: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.019.
15. Klimova Yu.O., Ustinova K.A., Frolov I.E. Funding research and development in regions: tasks, current state, prospects // Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 5. P. 135-152. doi: 10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.7.
16. Смородинская Н.В., Катуков Д.Д. Когда и почему региональные кластеры становятся базовым звеном национальной экономики // Балтийский регион. 2019. Т. 11. № 3. С. 61-91. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-3-4.
17. Боткин О.И., Сутыгина А.И., Сутыгин П.Ф. Особенности взаимодействия факторов конкурентоспособности региональной агропродовольственной системы // АПК: экономика, управление. 2018. № 5. С. 24-30.
18. K. Malek, E. Maine, I. McCarthy. A typology of clean technology commercialization accelerators // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2014. No. 32. P. 26-39. doi:10.1016/J.JENGTECMAN.2013.10.006.
19. Завьялова Е.К., Соколов Д.Н., Кучеров Д.Г., Лисовская А.Ю. Настоящее и будущее цифровых методов управления человеческими ресурсами // Форсайт. 2022. Т. 16. № 2. С. 42-52. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2022.2.42.51.
1. Romanova OA, Akberdina VV, Bryantseva OS. [The potential of the old industrial region in the context of the neoindustrial paradigm of development]. Vestnik Zabaykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013; 2 (93). 142-152 p.
2. Tolkachev SA. [Industry 4.0 and its impact on the technological foundations of technological security in Russia]. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta. 2017; Vol. 7. 1(25). 86-91 p.
3. Ovchinnikova AV, Sutygina AI, Matveev VV. Razvitie regional'no-orientirovannykh proizvodstvennykh system. [Development of regionally oriented production systems]. Ekaterinburg-Izhevsk: IE UrO RAN. 2021; 230 p.
4. Yulenkova I.B. [Factors of innovative development of the region] Regionologiia. 2019; 27. 4(109). 661-677 p. doi: 10.15507/2413-1407.109.027.201904.661-677.
5. Zhang Y, Hu P. Analysis on the overall level of regional innovation environment in China. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 2018; 159-164 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3241748.3241771.
6. Porter ME. The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies. 2003; 37. 549-578 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000108688.
7. Kurbatova MV, Levin SN, Kagan ES, Kislitsyn DV. [Resource-type regions in Russia: definition and classification]. Terra Economicus. 2019; 17(3). 89-106 p. doi: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-3-89-106.
8. Efimova EG, Gritsenko D. [The role of the mining industry in the development of the peripheral Arctic regions of Russia and Canada]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 2021; 37 (2). 241-271 p. doi:10.21638/spbu05.2021.203.
9. Kryukov VA, Shmat VV, Nefedkin VI. Resursnye regiony Rossii v “novoi real'nosti”. [Resource regions of Russia in the “new reality”]. Novosibirsk: IE OIP SO RAN. 2017; 308 p.
10. Bukhval'd EM. [Development institutions and national security of the Russian Federation]. Razvitie i bezopasnost'. 2021; 1(9). 16-28 p. doi:10.46960/2713-2633_2021_1_16.
11. Dorzhieva VV, Il'ina SA. [Scenario of reforming development Institutions: in search of meaning and new aspects of regulatory policy]. Ekonomika, predprinimatel'stvo i pravo. 2021; Vol.11. 11. 2451-2470 p. doi: 10.18334/epp.11.11.113770.
12. Doroshenko YuA, Malykhina IO, Somina IV. [Innovative development of the region in the context of modern trends of neo-industrialization]. Ekonomika regiona. 2020; Vol.16. 1318-1334 p. doi: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-4-21.
13. Sutygina AI. [National food independence in times of crisis]. Ekonomika sel'skogo khoziaistva Rossii. 2020; 6. 2-6 p. doi: 10.32651/206-2.
14. Rogulin RS. [The role of information and communication technologies in building resilient supply chains before and after the Covid-19 pandemic]. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2021; Vol.20. 3. 461-488 p. doi: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.019.
15. Klimova YuO, Ustinova KA, Frolov IE. Funding research and development in regions: tasks, current state, prospects. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2022; Vol.15. 5. 135-152 p. doi: 10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.7.
16. Smorodinskaya NV, Katukov DD. [When and why regional clusters become the basic link of the national economy]. Baltiiskii region. 2019; Vol.11. 3. 61-91 p. doi: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-3-4.
17. Botkin OI, Sutygina AI, Sutygin PF. [Features of the interaction of factors of competitiveness of the regional agrofood system]. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2018; 5. 24-30 p.
18. Malek K, Maine E, McCarthy I. A typology of clean technology commercialization accelerators. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2014; 32. 26-39 p. doi:10.1016/J.JENGTECMAN.2013.10.006
19. Zav'yalova EK, Sokolov DN, Kucherov DG., Lisovskaya AYu. [the present and future of digital human resource management]. Forsait. 2022; Vol.16. 2. 42-52 p. doi: 10.17323/2500-2597.2022.2.42.51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
