INFLUENCE OF METEOROLOGICAL INDICATORS ON OATS YIELD IN CROPPING ROTATIONS

DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2024-18-24 УДК 551.506.3:631.559:633.13

Authors

  • Pavel Afanasevich Postnikov Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
  • Vera Viktorovna Popova Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
  • Olga Vladimirovna Vasina Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
  • Pavel Yurevich Ovchinnikov Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

Keywords:

oats (Avena sativa), crop rotation, temperature, precipitation, hydrothermal coefficient, yield, correlation coefficients.

Abstract

The studies were carried out to assess the influence of predecessors in crop rotations and nutrition background on the formation of oat yields under different weather conditions. The work was carried out in a stationary two-factor experiment in 2016–2020 in the conditions of the Middle Urals on dark gray heavy loamy soil. The experimental design included the following options: crop rotation (factor A) – green manure (green manure fallow (rapeseed), wheat, oats, peas, barley), grain-grass rotation with a share of legumes of 40% (peas, wheat + clover, clover 1 g.p., barley, oats); background nutrition (factor B) – without mineral fertilizers (control); N30P30K36 (on average per 1 ha of crop rotation area - mineral background); N24P24K30 in combination with green manure and straw (organomineral background). The lowest harvest of oat grain was noted in 2016 in severely arid conditions (GTC = 0.63); it varied depending on the predecessor and nutritional background from 1.30 to 1.70 t/ha. The highest productivity of grain fodder crops was observed in 2017-2018 with a hydrothermal coefficient of 1.8...2.0. In the control variant, it varied in the range from 3.09 to 3.69 t/ha, when applying fertilizers – 4.20…5.52 t/ha. In slightly dry conditions in 2020, the productivity of oats in crop rotations in the control was lower than under favorable weather conditions by 30%, and against the background of fertilizers - by 24...33%. In general, the productivity of the grain forage crop in the control depended little on the predecessor in crop rotations. The placement of oats as a second crop after clover on mineral and organomineral nutrition backgrounds ensured a noticeable increase in grain harvest in relation to green manure crop rotation (the second crop after plowing rapeseed), with the exception of 2016. On average, over the years of research, the increase in oat grain in grain-grass crop rotation was 0.55…0.56 t/ha. The correlation between the productivity of grain fodder crops and the amount of precipitation and the GTC value was positive (r=0.82...0.95), and with the temperature regime during the growing season - negative (r=-0.88...-0.97).

Information about the authors

Pavel Afanasevich Postnikov , Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

Ph.D. of Agricultural Sciences, Head of Agriculture and Feed Production Department

Vera Viktorovna Popova , Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

Ph.D. of Agricultural Sciences, Head of the analytical laboratory, e-mail: vvpopova_77@mail.ru Vasina Olga Vladimirovna

Olga Vladimirovna Vasina , Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

Junior researcher of Agriculture and Feed Production Department

Pavel Yurevich Ovchinnikov , Ural Federal Agrarian Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia.

Junior researcher of Agriculture and Feed Production Department

References

 1. Шиловская С. А. Влияние изменения климата на сельское хозяйство и обеспечение продовольственной безопасности // АПК: экономика и управление. 2014. № 10. С. 67–73.

 2. Pereira L. Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture across Africa. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2017. URL: https://www0.sun.ac.za/cst/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Pereira2017.pdf (дата обращения: 28.03.2023). doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.292.3.

 3. Ciscar J-C., Fisher-Vanden K., Lobell D. B. Synthesis and Review: an inter-method comparison of climate change impacts on agriculture // Environ. RES. Lett. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 7. Article 070401. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aac7cb (дата обращения: 28.03.2023). doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac7cb.

 4. Романенков В. А., Павлова В. Н., Беличенко М. В. Оценка климатических рисков при возделывании зерновых культур на основе региональных данных и результатов длительных опытов Геосети // Агрохимия. 2018. № 1. С. 77–86.

 5. Щербакова А. С. Агроклиматические районы и урожайность сельскохозяйственных культур в изменяющихся условиях регионального климата // Вестник Казанского ГАУ. 2021. №1 (61). С. 142–147. doi: 10.12737/2073-2021-142-147.

 6. Доклад об особенностях климата на территории Российской Федерации за 2020 год / М. Ю. Бардин, В. И. Егоров, С. А. Громов и др. М.: Росгидромет, 2021. 104 с. URL: http://igce.ru›climatechange/reports (дата обращения: 28.03.2023).

 7. Шайтанов О. Л., Низамов Р. М., Захарова Е. И. Оценка глобального потепления на климат Татарстана // Зернобобовые и крупяные культуры. 2021. № 4 (40). С. 102–112. doi: 10.24412 /2309-348Х-2021-4-102-112.

 8. Глаз Н. В., Васильев А. А. Изменения климата // Дальневосточный аграрный вестник. 2018. № 4 (48). С. 32–39. DOI: 10.24411/1989-6837-2018-14078.

 9. Баталова Г. А. Овес, технология возделывания и селекция. Киров, 2000. 206 с.

 10. Урожайность и качество зерна овса при возделывании в севообороте и при длительном применении минеральных и органических удобрений / А. В. Козлова, Г. Е. Мерзлая, Г. А. Зябкина и др. // Плодородие. 2014. № 1. С. 10–12.

 11. Эффективность систем удобрения в севообороте при возделывании овса на зерно / В. Б. Коренев, И. Н. Белоус., Г. Л. Яговенко и др. // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2015. № 9 (139). С. 13–18.

 12. Impact of lime and NPK fertilizers on yield and quality of oats on pseudogley soil and their valorisation / V. Ralcic, V. Popovic, D. Terzic, et al. // Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici, Cluj-Napoca, 2020. Vol. 48. No. 4. P. 2134–2152. doi: 10.15835/nbha48412106.

 13. Анкудович Ю. Н. Влияние климатических и агрохимических факторов на урожайность овса в условиях севера Томской области // Сибирский вестник сельскохозяйственной науки. 2015. № 5 (246). С. 40–47.

 14. Кардашина В. Е., Николаева Л. С. Влияние агрометеорологических условий на урожайность и развитие овса // Пермский аграрный вестник. 2018. № 1 (21). С. 69–76.

 15. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L., Hakala K. Crop responses to temperature and precipitation according to long-term multi-location trials at high-latitude condition // The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2011. Vol. 149. No. 1. P. 49–62.

 16. Yield Performance of Spring Oats Varieties as a Response to Fertilization and Sowing Distance / M. Duda, H. Tritean, J. Racz, et al. // Agronomy. 2021. Vol. 11. No.5. Article815. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/5/815 (дата обращения: 30.03.23). doi: 10.3390/agronomy11050815.

 17. Рекомендации по проведению полевых работ в сельскохозяйственных предприятиях Свердловской области в 2015 году / Н. Н. Зезин, А. П. Колотов, А. А. Шанин и др. Екатеринбург: ФГБНУ Уральский НИИСХ, 2015. 56 с.

 18. Елисеев С. Л, Ашихмин Н. В., Яркова Н. Н. Предшественники и нормы высева овса Конкур в Среднем Предуралье // Вестник БГАУ. 2016. № 3. С. 25–29.

 1. Shilovskaya SA. [The impact of climate change on agriculture and food security]. APK: ekonomika i upravlenie. 2014; 10. 67-73 р.

 2. Pereira L. Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture across Africa. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2017. [cited 2023, March 28]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328065888_why_don’t_adapt_tunisian_agriculture_to_climate_change_2_how_climate_affects_agriculture.

 3. Ciscar J-C., Fisher-Vanden K., Lobell DB. Synthesis and Review: an inter-method comparison of climate change impacts on agriculture. Environmental Research Letters. 2018; 13(7). p. 070401. [cited 2023, March 28]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325369466_Synthesis_and_Review_an_intermethod_comparison_of_climate_change_impacts_on_agriculture.

 4. Romanenkov VA, Pavlova VN, Belichenko MV. [Assessment of climate risks in the cultivation of grain crops based on regional data and the results of long-term experiments Geonetworks]. Agrokhimiya. 2018; 1. 77-86 p.

 5. Shcherbakova AS. [Agroclimatic regions and crop yields under changing regional climate conditions]. Vestnik Kazanskogo GAU. 2021; 1(61). 142-147 p. DOI:10.12737/2073-2021-142-147.

 6. Bardin MYu, Egorov VI, Gromov SA. Doklad ob osobennostyah klimata na territorii Rossiyskoy Federatsii za 2020 god. [Report on climate features in the Russian Federation for 2020]. M.: Rosgidromet. 2021; 104 р. [cited 2023, March 28]. Available from: http://igce.ru›climatechange/reports.

 7. Shaytanov OL, Nizamov RM, Zakharova EI. [Assessment of global warming on the climate of Tatarstan]. Nauchnoproizvodstvennuy zhurnal Zernobobovye i krupyanye kultury. 2021; 4(40). 102-112 p. DOI:10.24412 /2309-348Х-2021-4-102-112.

 8. Glaz NV, Vasilev AA. [Climate change]. Dalnevostochnuy agrarnuy vestnik. 2018; 4(48). 32-39 p. doi:10.24411/1989-6837-2018-14078.

 9. Batalova GA. [Oats, cultivation technology and selection]. Oves, tekhnologiya vozdelyvaniya i selektsiya. Kirov. 2000; 206 p.

 10. Kozlova AV, Merzlaya GE, Zyabkina GA. [Productivity and quality of oat grain when cultivated in crop rotation and with long-term use of mineral and organic fertilizers]. Plodorodie. 2014; 1. 10-12 p.

 11. Korenev VB, Belous IN, Yagovenko GL. [Efficiency of fertilizer systems in crop rotation when cultivating oats for grain]. Agrarnuy vestnik Urala. 2015; 9(139). 13-18 p.

 12. Rajicic V., Popovic, V., Terzic, D. Impact of lime and NPK fertilizers on yield and quality of oats on pseudogley soil and their valorization. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2020; 48(4). 2134-2152 p. [cited 2023, March 30]. Available from: https://www.notulaebotanicae.ro/index.php/nbha/article/view/12106.

 13. Ankudovich YuN. [The influence of climatic and agrochemical factors on the yield of oats in the north of the Tomsk region]. Sibirskiy vestnik selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki. 2015; 5(246). 40-47 p.

 14. Kardashina VE, Nikolaeva LS. [The influence of agrometeorological conditions on the yield and development of oats]. Permskiy agrarnuy vestnik. 2018; 1(21). 69-76 p.

 15. Peltonen-Sainio P, Jauhiainen L, Hakala K. Crop responses to temperature and precipitation according to long-term multi-location trials at high-latitude conditions. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2011; 149(01). 49-62 p.

 16. Duda M., Tritean N., Racz I, et al. Yield performance of spring oats varieties as a response to fertilization and sowing distance. Agronomy. 2021; 11(5), 815. [cited 2023, March 30]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351042650_Yield_Performance_of_Spring_Oats_Varieties_as_a_Response_to_Fertilization_and_Sowing_Distance.

 17. Zezin NN, Kolotov AP, Shanin AA [et al.]. Rekomendacii po provedeniyu polevyh rabot v selskohozyaystvennykh predpriyatiyah Sverdlovskoy oblasti v 2015 godu. [Recommendations for conducting field work in agricultural enterprises of Sverdlovsk region in 2015]. Ekaterinburg: FGBNU Uralskiy NIISKh. 2015; 56 p.

 18. Eliseev SL, Ashikhmin NV, Yarkova NN. [Predecessors and seeding rates of oats Konkur in the Middle Urals]. Vestnik BGAU. 2016; 3. 25-29 p.

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Postnikov . П. А. ., Popova В. В., Vasina О. В. ., & Ovchinnikov . П. Ю. (2026). INFLUENCE OF METEOROLOGICAL INDICATORS ON OATS YIELD IN CROPPING ROTATIONS: DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2024-18-24 УДК 551.506.3:631.559:633.13. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 19(2). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/164

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories