EVALUATION OF REMONTANT RASPBERRY GENE POOL FOR PEST RESISTANCE IN THE SOUTHERN BAIKAL REGION
УДК: 634.1.054 DOI: 10.31588/2073-0462-2026-21-2-37-45 EDN: ECYFSW
Keywords:
remontant raspberry, assessment, HTC, pests, spider mites, aphidsAbstract
The study was conducted from 2019 to 2025 in Irkutsk to evaluate the resistance of parental varieties and hybrid raspberry seedlings to major plant pests. The study subjects included 13 parental varieties and over 250 open-pollinated plants. The evaluation was conducted under natural pest control, without the use of fertilizers or plant protection products. In 2024 and 2025, favorable conditions for spider mites developed. The soil on the site was gray forest soil, medium loamy. During the study period, pests from Lepidoptera order and Tenthredinidae family, as well as the species Pegomya rubivora Coq. and Batophila rubi Payk. Damage by these pests, on average, did not exceed 5% across years. Evraziya, Zolotye kupola, Rubinovoe ozherele varieties and 32-151-1 Form were most frequently damaged by Aphis idaei and were classified as moderately resistant (2 points). Based on leaf resistance assessments, Zhar-ptitsa, Oranzhevoe chudo and Gerakl varieties were the most susceptible. Their average damage score was 2.0 points, placing them in the moderately resistant category. Among the everbearing raspberry hybrids, a group of selections resistant to spider mites (<1 point) was identified: 1-3-3, 1-3-2, 1-4-1, 1-4-9. Analysis of the species structure of the phytophagous mite population in June revealed the dominance of Tetranychus urticae. In some years of the study, Phyllocoptes gracilis was recorded on the lower leaves, with a population ratio of 4:1 (T. urticae : P. gracilis). In July-August, T. urticae maintained its dominant position in the population structure, accounting for over 60%. In September, a shift in dominance was noted: Neotetranychus rubi predominated, with a population ratio of N. rubi : T. urticae 2:1.
References
1. Раздобурдин В. А., Кириллова О. С. Поверхность листовой пластинки как фактор, влияющий на развитие паутинного клеща на огурце // Вестник защиты растений. 2019. № 4 (102). С. 60–65. doi: 10.31993/2308-6459-2019-4-102-60-65.
2. Зейналов А. С., Чурилина Т. Н., Давлетшина Ю. Б. Биоэкологические особенности и вредоносность обыкновенного паутинного клеща (Tetranychus urticae (Koch.)) на землянике садовой в Оренбургской области // Плодоводство и ягодоводство России. 2021. № 65. С.76‒86. doi: 10.31676/2073-4948-2021-65-76-86
3. The species, density, and intra-plant distribution of mites on red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) / J. L. Tan, N. Trandem, Z. Hamborg, et al. // Exp Appl Acarol. 2024. Vol. 93 (2). P. 317‒337. doi: 10.1007/s10493-024-00930-7.
4. Delivering sustainable crop protection systems via the seed: exploiting natural constitutive and inducible defence pathways / J. A. Pickett, G. I. Aradottir, M. A. Birkett, et al. // Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014. Vol. 369 (1639). Article 20120281. URL: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article-abstract/369/1639/20120281/57924/Delivering-sustainable-crop-protection-systems-via?redirectedFrom=fulltext (дата обращения: 15.04.2024). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0281.
5. Киселева Е. Н., Раченко М. А. Оценка гибридных сеянцев малины ремонтантной по устойчивости к вредителям в Южном Предбайкалье // Материалы Всероссийской (национальной) научно-практической конференции с международным участием, посвященной 75-летию Уральского сада лечебных культур им. Профессора Л. И. Вигорова. Екатеринбург: УГЛТУ, 2025. C. 160‒167.
6. Анорбаев А. Р., Рахманов А. Х. Видовой состав паутинных клещей (Tetranychidae), встречающихся в семечковых плодовых садах Узбекистана // Universum: химия и биология. 2021. № 4 (82). С. 8‒10.
7. Incidence of aphid-transmitted viruses in raspberry and raspberry aphids in Norway and experiments on aphid transmission of black raspberry necrosis virus / B. Sapkota, N. Trandem, J. Franova, et al. // Front Plant Sci. 2024. Vol. 15. Article 1441145. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1441145/full?utm_source=researchgate.net&utm_medium=article (дата обращения: 15.12.2025). doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1441145. eCollection 2024.
8. Known and Potential Invertebrate Vectors of Raspberry Viruses / J. L. Tan, N. Trandem, J. Franova, et al. // Viruses. 2022. Vol. 14(3). Article 571. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/3/571 (дата обращения: 21.03.2023). doi: 10.3390/v14030571.
9. Raspberry Viruses in the Czech Republic, with Identification of a Novel Virus: Raspberry Virus A / J. L. Tan, I. Koloniuk, O. Lenz, et al. // Viruses. 2025. Vol. 17. No. 12. Article 1597. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/12/1597 (дата обращения: 15.01.2026). doi: 10.3390/v17121597.
10. Assessment of applying an integrated pest management strategy to control the raspberry leaf and bud mite, Phyllocoptes gracilis (Nal.) and its effect on the raspberry leaf metabolites / G. Podedworny, M. Tartanus, D. Solecka, et al. // Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2024. Vol. 64. No. 1. P. 52–60. doi: 10.24425/jppr.2024.149152.
11. Ермолаева Л. В., Сорокин А. А. Устойчивость жимолости синей к тлям на Северо-Западе России // Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного аграрного университета. 2020. С. 52‒57. doi: 10.24411/2078-1318-2020-12052.
12. Rakhmanov A. Tetranychus urticae Koch Biology on Apple Trees // Бюллетень науки и практики. 2024. Т. 10. №10. С. 239‒243. doi: 10.33619/2414-2948/107/28.
13. Куклина А. Г., Каштанова О. А., Сорокопудов В. Н. Фитосанитарный мониторинг жимолости синей в Средней России // Вестник КрасГАУ. 2019. № 9. С. 35–40.
14. Невоструева Е. Ю. Исходные формы малины на устойчивость к малинному клещу в условиях Среднего Урала // Селекция и сорторазведение садовых культур. 2016. Т. 3. С. 98–100.
15. Программа и методике селекции плодовых, ягодных и орехоплодных культур / под ред. Е. Н. Седова. Орел: ВНИИСПК, 1995. 503 с.
16. Определитель вредных и полезных насекомых и клещей плодовых и ягодных культур в СССР / В. С. Великань, А. М. Гегечкори, В.Б. Голуб и др.; Сост. Л.М. Копанева. Л.: Колос. Ленингр. Отд-ние, 1984. 288 с.
17. Лившиц И. З., Митрофанов В. И., Петрушов А. З. Сельскохозяйственная акарология. М.: ГНУ ВСТИСП Россельхозакадемии, 2011. 351 с.
18. Оценка семенной продуктивности родительских видов и гибридов Trollius с использованием критерия Манна-Уитни / Л. В. Буглова, М. В. Козлова, О. Ю. Васильева и др. // Вестник Оренбургского государственного педагогического университета. Электронный научный журнал. 2024 № 1 (49). С. 6–16.
1. Razdoburdin VA, Kirillova OS. [Leaf blade surface as a factor influencing spider mite development on cucumber]. Vestnik zashchity rasteniy. 2019; 4 (102). 60-65 p. doi: 10.31993/2308-6459-2019-4-102-60-65.
2. Zeynalov AS, Churilina TN, Davletshina YuB. [Bioecological features and harmfulness of the common spider mite (Tetranychus urticae (Koch.)) on garden strawberries in Orenburg region]. Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. 2021; 65. 76-86 p. doi: 10.31676/2073-4948-2021-65-76-86
3. Tan JL, Trandem N, Hamborg Z. The species, density, and intra-plant distribution of mites on red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.). Exp Appl Acarol. 2024; Vol. 93 (2). 317-337 p. doi: 10.1007/s10493-024-00930-7.
4. Pickett JA, Aradottir GI, Birkett MA. Delivering sustainable crop protection systems via the seed: exploiting natural constitutive and inducible defence pathways. [Internet]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014; Vol.369 (1639). Article 20120281. [cited 2024, April 15]. Available from: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rstb/article-abstract/369/1639/20120281/57924/Delivering-sustainable-crop-protection-systems-via?redirectedFrom=fulltext. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0281.
5. Kiseleva EN, Rachenko MA. [Evaluation of hybrid remontant raspberry seedlings for pest resistance in the Southern Baikal region]. Materialy Vserossiyskoy (natsionalnoy) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem, posvyashchennoy 75-letiyu Uralskogo sada lechebnykh kultur im. Professora L.I.Vigorova. Ekaterinburg: UGLTU. 2025; 160-167 p.
6. Anorbaev AR, Rakhmanov AKh. [Species composition of spider mites (Tetranychidae) found in pome fruit orchards of Uzbekistan]. Universum: khimiya i biologiya. 2021; 4 (82). 8-10 p.
7. Sapkota B, Trandem N, Franova J. Incidence of aphid-transmitted viruses in raspberry and raspberry aphids in Norway and experiments on aphid transmission of black raspberry necrosis virus. [Internet]. Front Plant Sci. 2024. Vol. 15. Article 1441145. [cited 2025, December 15]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1441145/full?utm_source=researchgate.net&utm_medium=article. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1441145. eCollection 2024.
8. Tan JL, Trandem N, Franova J. Known and potential invertebrate vectors of raspberry viruses. [Internet]. Viruses. 2022; Vol.14(3). Article 571. [cited 2023, March 21]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/14/3/571. doi: 10.3390/v14030571.
9. Tan JL, Koloniuk I, Lenz O. Raspberry viruses in the Czech Republic, with identification of a novel virus: raspberry virus A. [Internet]. Viruses. 2025; Vol.17. No.12. Article 1597. [cited 2026, January 15]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4915/17/12/1597. doi: 10.3390/v17121597.
10. Podedworny G, Tartanus M, Solecka D. Assessment of applying an integrated pest management strategy to control the raspberry leaf and bud mite, Phyllocoptes gracilis (Nal.) and its effect on the raspberry leaf metabolites. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 2024; Vol.64. No.1. 52-60 p. doi: 10.24425/jppr.2024.149152.
11. Ermolaeva LV, Sorokin AA. [Resistance of blue honeysuckle to aphids in the north-west of Russia]. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020; 52-57 p. doi: 10.24411/2078-1318-2020-12052.
12. Rakhmanov A. Tetranychus urticae Koch Biology on apple trees. Byulleten nauki i praktiki. 2024; Vol.10. 10. 239-243 p. doi: 10.33619/2414-2948/107/28.
13. Kuklina AG, Kashtanova OA, Sorokopudov VN. [Phytosanitary monitoring of blue honeysuckle in Central Russia]. Vestnik KrasGAU. 2019; 9. 35-40 p.
14. Nevostrueva EYu. [Initial forms of raspberry for resistance to raspberry mite in the conditions of Middle Urals]. Selektsiya i sortorazvedenie sadovykh kultur. 2016; Vol.3. 98-100 p.
15. Sedov EN. Programma i metodika selektsii plodovykh, yagodnykh i orekhoplodnykh kultur. [Program and methods for breeding fruit, berry and nut crops]. Orel: VNIISPK. 1995; 503 p.
16. Velikan VS, Gegechkori AM, Golub VB. [Identifier of harmful and beneficial insects and mites of fruit and berry crops in the USSR]. Sost. L.M. Kopaneva. Leningrad: Kolos. Leningr. otd-nie. 1984; 288 p.
17. Livshits IZ, Mitrofanov VI, Petrushov AZ. Selskokhozyaystvennaya akarologiya. [Agricultural acarology]. Moscow: GNU VSTISP Rosselkhozakademii. 2011; 351 p.
18. Buglova LV, Kozlova MV, Vasileva OYu. [Evaluation of seed productivity of parental species and hybrids of Trollius using Mann-Whitney test]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2024; 1 (49). 6-16 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
