PHYTOSANITARY CONDITION OF PEA AGROPHYTOCOENOSES (PISUM SATIVUM L.) UNDER DIFFERENT SOIL TILLAGE METHODS
DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-46-52 УДК 632.931:633.31/.37
Keywords:
pea (Pisum sativum L.), basic tillage, weeds, phytophages, phytopathogens.Abstract
Research was carried out to determine the influence of various systems of basic soil cultivation on the prevalence and development of pests in the agrophytocenosis of peas. The work was carried out in 2017-2019 in the Republic of Mordovia in the second rotation of the crop rotation: peas - winter wheat - soybeans - spring barley. The experimental scheme included the following options: autumn disking at 10…12 cm + moldboard plowing at 22…24 cm (disking + plowing); autumn disking with a disc harrow at 10…12 cm (disking); zero tillage (direct sowing). The use of disking and direct sowing increased the infestation of crops with young weeds, compared with plowing, by 12 and 24 weeds/m2. Plowing led to a decrease in the amount of thistle and horsetail. The prevalence of rust and gray rot in peas was largely influenced by weather conditions favorable to pathogens. In 2017 the prevalence of rust in the flowering phase was higher than in the drier years of 2018-2019 by 44...53%, gray mold - by 17...23%. The intensity of pathogen development increased as the crop matured; in the experiment, the lowest value of this indicator was against the background of disking. Plowing significantly reduced the density of the pea aphid population compared to disking (by 79%) and direct sowing (by 11%). A similar pattern was noted for gamma moth caterpillars. The results obtained can be used in the development of an integrated system for protecting peas from a complex of pests for the southern forest-steppe of the Non-Chernozem zone of the Russian Federation.
References
1. Вьюгин С. М., Вьюгина Г. В. Регулирование фитосанитарного состояния агроценозов // Земледелие. 2012. № 1. С. 39 – 41.
2. Торопова Е. Ю., Чулкина В. А., Стецов Г. Я. Влияние способов обработки почвы на фитосанитарное состояние посевов // Защита и карантин растений. 2010. № 1. С. 26-27.
3. Иващенко В. Г., Павлюшин В. А. Интенсификация растениеводства и эколого-продукционный баланс агроэкосистем: снижение плодородия почв и фитосанитарная дестабилизация // Вестник защиты растений. 2017. № 3 (93). С. 5–16.
4. Павлюшин В. А. Проблемы фитосанитарного оздоровления агроэкосистем // Вестник защиты растений. 2011. № 2. С. 3–9.
5. Жученко А. А. Ресурсный потенциал производства зерна в России (теория и практика). М.: Агроресурс, 2004. 1110 с.
6. Шашкаров Л. Г., Кузнецов Л. В. Засоренность озимой тритикале в зависимости от агротехнических приемов возделывания // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. 2016. Т. 11. № 3 (41). С. 16–19. doi: 10.12737/22669.
7. Марьина-Чермных О. Г., Евдокимова М. А. Влияние агротехнических приемов на численность почвенных патогенов при возделывании озимой ржи // Вестник Ульяновской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2015. № 4 (32). С. 40–44. doi: 10.18286/1816-4501-2015-4-40-44.
8. Влияние способов обработки почвы на развитие насекомых - фитофагов и энтомофагов при возделывании сельскохозяйственных культур (обзор) / М. В. Пушня, О. Ю. Кремнева, А. В. Пономарев и др. // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2023. Т. 37. № 5. С. 51-57. doi: 10.53859/02352451_2023_37_5_51.
9. Towards a no-till no-spray future? Introduction to a symposium on nonchemical weed management for reduced-tillage cropping systems. / D. C. Brainard, E. Haramoto, M. Williams, et al. //Weed Technology. 2013. Т. 27. No. 1. P. 190–192.
10. Weed Flora and Soil Seed Bank Composition as affected by tillage system in three-year crop rotation. / B. Feledyn-Szewczyk, J. Smagacz, C. A. Kwiatkowski, et al. //Agriculture. 2020. Т. 10. No. 5. P. 186.
11. Wozniak A. Rachon L., Effect of tillage systems on pea crop infestation with weeds. //Archives of agronomy and soil science. 2019. Т. 65. No. 7. P. 877–885.
12. Кузина Е. В. Влияние различных способов обработки почвы на засоренность посевов в условиях лесостепи Среднего Поволжья // Пермский аграрный вестник. 2017. № 3 (19). С. 80–85.
13. Курдюкова О. Н. Система основной обработки почвы и засоренность посевов в севообороте // Известия Тимирязевской сельскохозяйственной академии. 2016. № 2. С. 76– 81.
14. Лаптиев А. Б., Кунгурцева О. В. Предпосылки и основы химической защиты гороха от болезней // Зернобобовые и крупяные культуры. 2016. № 2 (18). С. 99–103.
15. Hanavan R. P., Bosque-Pérez N. A. Effects of tillage practices on pea leaf weevil (Sitona lineatus L., Coleoptera: Curculionidae) biology and crop damage: A farm-scale study in the US Pacific Northwest // Bulletin of entomological research. 2012. Т. 102. No. 6. P. 682–691.
16. Демкин В. И., Добронравова М. В., Васильева Н. Н. Интегрированная система защиты гороха от вредных объектов в условиях неустойчивого увлажнения Центрального Предкавказья // Вестник АПК Ставрополья. 2011. № 1 (1). С. 7–10.
17. Design, assessment and feasibility of legume-based cropping systems in three European regions / E. Pelzer, C. Bourlet, G. Carlsson, et al. // Crop and Pasture Science. 2017. Т. 68. No. 11. P. 902–914.
18. Экотопическая флуктуация сорного компонента агрофитоценоза озимой пшеницы / А. Н. Никольский, Д. В. Бочкарев, Н. В. Смолин и др. // Вестник Алтайского государственного аграрного университета. 2012. № 9 (95). С. 33–37
19. Integrated management of botrytis gray mold of chickpea / S. Pande, P. Stevenson, J. N. Rao, et al. // Plant Disease. 2005. Т. 89. No. 12. P. 1252– 1262.
20. Modelling the impacts of pests and diseases on agricultural systems / M. Donatelli, R. D. Magarey, S. Bregaglio et al. //Agricultural systems. 2017. Т. 155. P. 213–224.
1. V'yugin SM, V'yugina GV. [Regulation of the phytosanitary state of agrocenoses]. Zemledelie. 2012; 1. 39-41 p.
2. Toropova EYu, Chulkina VA, Stetsov GYa. [Influence of soil treatment methods on the phytosanitary condition of crops]. Zashchita i karantin rastenii. 2010; 1. 26-27 p.
3. Ivashchenko VG, Pavlyushin VA. [Intensification of crop production and ecological-production balance of agroecosystems: decrease in soil fertility and phytosanitary destabilization]. Vestnik zashchity rastenii. 2017; 3 (93). 5-16 p.
4. Pavlyushin VA. [Problems of phytosanitary improvement of agroecosystems]. 2011; 2. 3-9 p.
5. Zhuchenko AA. Resursnyi potentsial proizvodstva zerna v Rossii (teoriya i praktika). [Resource potential of grain production in Russia (theory and practice)]. Moscow: Agroresurs. 2004; 1110 p.
6. Shashkarov LG, Kuznetsov LV. [Infestation of winter triticale depending on agrotechnical cultivation methods]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2016; Vol.11. 3 (41). 16-19 p. doi: 10.12737/22669.
7. Mar'ina-Chermnykh OG, Evdokimova MA. [The influence of agrotechnical practices on the number of soil pathogens during winter rye cultivation]. Vestnik Ul'yanovskoy gosudarstvennoy sel'skokhozyaistvennoy akademii. 2015; 4 (32). 40-44 p. doi: 10.18286/1816-4501-2015-4-40-44.
8. Pushnya MV, Kremneva OYu, Ponomarev AV. [The influence of soil cultivation methods on the development of insects - phytophages and entomophages during the cultivation of agricultural crops (review)]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2023; Vol.37. 5. 51-57 p. doi: 10.53859/02352451_2023_37_5_51.
9. Brainard DC, Haramoto E, Williams M. Towards a no-till no-spray future? Introduction to a symposium on nonchemical weed management for reduced-tillage cropping systems. Weed Technology. 2013; Vol.27. 1. 190-192 p.
10. Feledyn-Szewczyk B, Smagacz J, Kwiatkowski CA. Weed flora and soil seed bank composition as affected by tillage system in three-year crop rotation. Agriculture. 2020; Vol.10. 5. 186 p.
11. Wozniak A, Rachon L. Effect of tillage systems on pea crop infestation with weeds. Archives of agronomy and soil science. 2019; Vol.65. 7. 877-885 p.
12. Kuzina EV. [The influence of various methods of tillage on crop weeds in the forest-steppe conditions of Middle Volga region]. Permskiy agrarnyi vestnik. 2017; 3 (19). 80-85 p.
13. Kurdyukova ON. [The system of primary tillage and weediness of crops in crop rotation]. Izvestiya Timiryazevskoi sel'skokhozyaistvennoi akademii. 2016; 2. 76-81 p.
14. Laptiev AB, Kungurtseva OV. [Prerequisites and fundamentals of chemical protection of peas from diseases]. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2016; 2 (18). 99-103 p.
15. Hanavan RP, Bosque-Pérez NA. Effects of tillage practices on pea leaf weevil (Sitona lineatus L., Coleoptera: Curculionidae) biology and crop damage: A farm-scale study in the US Pacific Northwest. Bulletin of entomological research. 2012; Vol.102. 6. 682-691 p.
16. Demkin VI, Dobronravova MV, Vasil'eva NN. [Integrated system for protecting peas from harmful objects in conditions of unstable moisture in the Central Ciscaucasia]. Vestnik APK Stavropol'ya. 2011; 1 (1). 7-10 p.
17. Pelzer E, Bourlet C, Carlsson G. Design, assessment and feasibility of legume-based cropping systems in three European regions. Crop and Pasture Science. 2017; Vol.68. 11. 902-914 p.
18. Nikol'skiy AN, Bochkarev DV, Smolin NV. [Ecotopic fluctuation of the weed component of winter wheat agrophytocenosis]. Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2012; 9 (95). 33-37 p.
19. Pande S, Stevenson P, Rao JN. Integrated management of botrytis gray mold of chickpea. Plant Disease. 2005; Vol.89. 12. 1252-1262 p.
20. Donatelli M, Magarey RD, Bregaglio S. Modelling the impacts of pests and diseases on agricultural systems. Agricultural systems. 2017; Vol.155. 213-224 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
