OBTAINING PROMISING STRAINS FROM WILD PLANTS FOR AGRICULTURAL USE

DOI 10.12737/2073046220244148 УДК 631.4

Authors

  • Bakhtiyar Ramilevic Islamov Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
  • Elena Yurevn Shulga Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.

Keywords:

consortium of microorganisms, enzymatic activities, wild plants, growth stimulation, antagonism.

Abstract

The research was conducted in order to create new consortia of microorganisms derived from wild plant species (St. John's wort, oregano, plantain and reed) and to test their ability to maintain them in the soil and rhizosphere. The properties of 216 bacterial isolates that are important for protecting and stimulating plant growth, both in the laboratory and in the field, were determined, namely, enzymatic activity, including phytase, protease, lipase, nitrogenase, cellulase and amylase. In addition, the antagonistic activity of isolates to a phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium oxysporum was tested. The isolates were then identified by comparing the sequences of the 16S rRNA gene. After that, pathogenic bacteria were screened out and, based on the displayed enzymatic activities, the most promising bacterial isolates were selected, from which a consortium was assembled to test the possibility of its maintenance in the soil and rhizosphere of Universiade wheat plants. For this purpose, the seeds were treated by a consortium at a dose of 1×10 CFU/ml in 1% carboxymethylcellulose solution and after 14 days, soil and roots of control and test plants were washed. The presence or absence of the studied strains was determined by PCR-fingerprinting. The consortium of microorganisms was better preserved in the soil than on the roots of plants. Its use increased the length of shoots of experimental plants, relative to the control ones, by 38.6% (from 10.6 cm to 14.7 cm), the length of the root system by 22.1% (from 12.2 cm to 14.9 cm) and seed germination by 3.0% (from 87% to 90%). The obtained data can be used for further experiments and practical applications in agriculture.

Information about the authors

Bakhtiyar Ramilevic Islamov , Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.

Ph.D. in Biology, researcher of Laboratory of Moleculargenetic and microbiological method

Elena Yurevn Shulga , Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.

Junior researcher of Laboratory of Moleculargenetic and microbiological methods

References

 1. Role of organic farming for achieving sustainability in agriculture / A. Gamage, R. Gangahagedara, J. Gamage, et al. // Farming System. 2023. Vol. 1. No. 1. Article 100005. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000059?via%3Dihub (дата обращения:1.10.2024).doi:10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100005.

 2. Organic farming in India: a vision towards a healthy nation / S. Das, A. Chatterjee, T. K. Pal // Food Quality and Safety. 2020. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 6976. Article 100005.URL:https://academic.oup.com/fqs/article-abstract/4/2/69/5861338 (дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyaa018.

 3. Эффективность лабораторного образца биопрепарата на основе Bacillus velezensis 336g при различных способах его применения для защиты от болезней озимых колосовых / А. М. Асатурова, Н. М. Сидоров, Н. С. Томашевич и др. // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2023. Т. 37. 5. С. 2833.

 4. The use of microbial inoculants for biological control, plant growth promotion, and sustainable agriculture: A review / A. S. M. Elnahal, M. T. ElSaadony, A. M. Saad, et al. // European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2022. Vol. 162. No. 4. P. 759792. doi: 10.1007/s10658022024723.

 5. Zoomingin on floral nectar: a first exploration of nectarassociated bacteria in wild plant communities / S. AlvarezPerez, C.M. Herrera, C. Vega // FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2012. Vol. 80. No. 3. P. 591602. doi: 10.1111/j.15746941.2012.01329.x.

 6. First report on Rahnella sp. strain EUA3SNfb, a plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium from wild wheat relative Aegilops kotschyi / R. Negi, T. Kaur, R. Devi, et al. // National Academy Science Letters. 2022. Vol. 45. No. 5. P. 393396. doi: 10.1007/s40009022011391.

 7. Etesami H., Alikhani H. A. Evaluation of grampositive rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria for biological control of fungal rice (Oryzia sativa L.) pathogens // European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2017. Vol. 147. P. 14. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s106580160981z (дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.1111/j.15746941.2012.01329.x.

 8. Physiological response, microbial diversity characterization, and endophytic bacteria isolation of duckweed under cadmium stress / X. Yang, T. AiJuan, Z. MengMeng, et al. // Science of The Total Environment. 2023. Vol. 902. Article 166056. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969723046818?via%3Dihub. дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166056.

 9. Chathalingath N., Gunasekar A. Elucidating the physiological and molecular characteristics of bacterial blight incitant Xanthomonas auxonopodis pv. punicae; a life threatening phytopathogen of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) and assessment of H2O2 accumulation during hostpathogen interaction // Microbial Pathogenesis. 2023. Vol. 182. Article 106277. URL: https://colab.ws/articles/10.1016%2Fj.micpath.2023.106277 (дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106277.

 10. Isolation and screening of extracellular protease enzyme from bacterial and fungal isolates of soil / A. K. Sharma, V. Sharma, J. Saxena, et al. // Int J Sci Res Environ Sci. 2015. Vol. 3. No. 9. P. 334340. doi: 10.12983/ijsres2015p03340340.

 11. Singh N. K., Joshi D. K., Gupta R. K. Isolation of phytase producing bacteria and optimization of phytase production parameters // Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2013. Vol. 6. No. 5. Article 6419. URL: https://brieflands.com/articles/jjm72602 (дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.5812/jjm.6419.

 12. Screening, purification and characterization of cellulase from cellulase producing bacteria in molasses / F. Islam, N. Roy // BMC research notes. 2018. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 6. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327545458 Screening purification and characterization of cellulase from cellulase producing bacteria in molasses (дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.1186/s1310401835584.

 13. Nimisha P., Moksha S., Gangawane A. K. Amylase activity of starch degrading bacteria isolated from soil // International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 659671. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.071.

 14. Genetic characteristics and enzymatic activities of Bacillus velezensis KS04AU as a stable biocontrol agent against phytopathogens / R. G. C. Diabankana, E. U. Shulga, S. Z. Validov, et al. // International Journal of Plant Biology. 2022. Vol. 13. No. 3. P. 201222. doi: 10.3390/ijpb13030018.

 15. Zebua A. C., Guchi H., Sembiring M. Isolation of nonsymbiotic Nitrogenfixing bacteria on andisol land affected by Sinabung eruption / // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. MedanIndonesia: IOP Publishing, 2020. Vol. 454. No.1. Article 012167. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/454/1/012167/meta (дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.1088/17551315/454/1/012167.

 16. Genomic Insights into the Microbial Agent Streptomyces albidoflavus MGMM6 for Various Biotechnology Applications / R. G. C. Diabankana, M. Frolov, S. Keremli, et al. // Microorganisms. 2023. Vol. 11. No. 12. Article 2872. https://www.mdpi.com/20762607/11/12/2872 (дата обращения: 01.10.2024). doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11122872.

 17. Antifungal properties, abiotic stress resistance, and biocontrol ability of Bacillus mojavensis PS17 / R. G. C. Diabankana, D. M. Afordoanyi, R. I. Safin, et al. // Current Microbiology. 2021. Vol. 78. No. 8. P. 31243132. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284021025787 (дата обращения: 1.10.2024). doi: 10.1007/s00284021025787.

 18. Combined use of biocontrol agents to manage plant diseases in theory and practice / X. M. Xu, P. Jeffries, M. Pautasso, et. al. // Phytopathology. 2011. Vol. 101. No. 9. Р. 10241031. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO08100216.

 1. Gamage A, Gangahagedara R, Gamage J. Role of organic farming for achieving sustainability in agriculture. [Internet]. Farming System. 2023; Vol.1. 1. Article 100005. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000059?via%3Dihub. doi: 10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100005.

 2. Das S, Chatterjee A, Pal TK. Organic farming in India: a vision towards a healthy nation. [Internet]. Food Quality and Safety. 2020; Vol.4. 2. 6976 p. Article 100005. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/fqs/article-abstract/4/2/69/5861338. doi: 10.1093/fqsafe/fyaa018.

 3. Asaturova AM, Sidorov NM, Tomashevich NS. 3. [Laboratory sample efficiency of biopreparation based on Bacillus velezensis 336g in various ways of its application for protection against diseases of winter crops]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2023; Vol.37. 5. 2833 p.

 4. Elnahal ASM, ElSaadony MT, Saad AM. The use of microbial inoculants for biological control, plant growth promotion, and sustainable agriculture: a review. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2022; Vol.162. 4. 759792 p. doi: 10.1007/s10658022024723.

 5. AlvarezPerez S, Herrera CM, Vega C. Zoomingin on floral nectar: a first exploration of nectarassociated bacteria in wild plant communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2012; Vol.80. 3. 591602 p. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01329.x.

 6. Negi R, Kaur T, Devi R. First report on Rahnella sp. strain EUA3SNfb, a plant growth promoting endophytic bacterium from wild wheat relative Aegilops kotschyi. National Academy Science Letters. 2022; Vol.45. 5. 393-396 p. doi: 10.1007/s40009022011391.

 7. Etesami H, Alikhani HA. Evaluation of grampositive rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria for biological control of fungal rice (Oryzia sativa L.) pathogens. [Internet]. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2017; Vol.147. 14 p. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s106580160981z. doi: 10.1111/j.15746941.2012.01329.x.

 8. Yang X, AiJuan T, MengMeng Z. Physiological response, microbial diversity characterization, and endophytic bacteria isolation of duckweed under cadmium stress. [Internet]. Science of The Total Environment. 2023; Vol.902. Article 166056. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969723046818?via%3Dihub. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166056.

 9. Chathalingath N, Gunasekar A. Elucidating the physiological and molecular characteristics of bacterial blight incitant Xanthomonas auxonopodis pv. punicae; a life threatening phytopathogen of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) and assessment of H2O2 accumulation during hostpathogen interaction. [Internet]. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2023; Vol.182. Article 106277. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://colab.ws/articles/10.1016%2Fj.micpath.2023.106277. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106277.

 10. Sharma AK, Sharma V, Saxena J. Isolation and screening of extracellular protease enzyme from bacterial and fungal isolates of soil. Int J Sci Res Environ Sci. 2015; Vol.3. 9. 334340 p. doi: 10.12983/ijsres2015p0334-0340.

 11. Singh NK, Joshi DK, Gupta RK. Isolation of phytase producing bacteria and optimization of phytase production parameters. [Internet]. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology. 2013; Vol.6. 5. Article 6419. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://brieflands.com/articles/jjm72602. doi: 10.5812/jjm.6419.

 12. Islam F, Roy N. Screening, purification and characterization of cellulase from cellulase producing bacteria in molasses. [Internet]. BMC research notes. 2018; Vol.11. 1. 16 p. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327545458 Screening purification and characterization of cellulase from cellulase producing bacteria in molasses. doi: 10.1186/s1310401835584.

 13. Nimisha P, Moksha S, Gangawane AK. Amylase activity of starch degrading bacteria isolated from soil. International Journal of current microbiology and applied sciences. 2019; Vol.8. 4. 659671 p. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2019.804.071.

 14. Diabankana RGC, Shulga EU, Validov SZ. Genetic characteristics and enzymatic activities of Bacillus velezensis KS04AU as a stable biocontrol agent against phytopathogens. International Journal of Plant Biology. 2022; Vol.13. 3. 201222 p. doi: 10.3390/ijpb13030018.

 15. Zebua AC, Guchi H, Sembiring M. Isolation of nonsymbiotic Nitrogenfixing bacteria on andisol land affected by Sinabung eruption. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. MedanIndonesia: IOP Publishing. 2020; Vol.454. 1. Article 012167. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/17551315/454/1/012167/meta. doi: 10.1088/17551315/454/1/012167.

 16. Diabankana RGC, Frolov M, Keremli S. Genomic Insights into the Microbial Agent Streptomyces albidoflavus MGMM6 for Various Biotechnology Applications. Microorganisms. 2023; Vol.11. 12. Article 2872. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from https://www.mdpi.com/20762607/11/12/2872. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11122872.

 17. Diabankana RGC, Afordoanyi DM, Safin RI. Antifungal properties, abiotic stress resistance, and biocontrol ability of Bacillus mojavensis PS17. Current Microbiology. 2021; Vol.78. 8. 31243132 p. [cited 2024, October 1]. Available from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00284021025787. doi: 10.1007/s00284021025787.

 18. Xu XM, Jeffries P, Pautasso M. Combined use of biocontrol agents to manage plant diseases in theory and practice. Phytopathology. 2011; Vol.101. 9. 10241031 p. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO08100216.

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Islamov Б. Р., & Shulga Е. Ю. (2026). OBTAINING PROMISING STRAINS FROM WILD PLANTS FOR AGRICULTURAL USE: DOI 10.12737/2073046220244148 УДК 631.4. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 19(4). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/125

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories