VARIETIES OF SPRING WHEAT OF EUROPEAN ORIGIN IN THE CONDITIONS OF TYUMEN REGION

DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-50-56 УДК 633.11:571.12

Authors

  • Vyacheslav Nikolaevich Timofeev Research Institute of Agriculture of the Northern Trans-Urals - a branch of Federal Research Center of Tyumen Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tyumen, Russia
  • Olga Anatolevna Vyushina Research Institute of Agriculture of the Northern Trans-Urals - a branch of Federal Research Center of Tyumen Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tyumen, Russia.

Keywords:

spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), cultivar, leaf diseases, productivity, grain quality.

Abstract

Studies for the comparative evaluation of economic traits of spring wheat varieties of European ecological and geographical origin in cultivation in Tyumen region were conducted in 2018-2020. We studied varieties of spring wheat of local (Omskaya 36, Grenada, Aviada) and European ecological and geographical origin (Goplana, Mandarina, Arabella). The germinating ability, germinal development, seed contamination and seed dressing efficiency were determined under laboratory conditions. Field experiment was laid in the nursery of competitive variety trials, plot area 20 m2, biometric observations, yield and its quality were carried out. The soil of the experimental site is dark gray forest, heavy loam. Under laboratory conditions on day 7 of observation there was a difference in the development of germinal organs. The greatest length of roots was in the standard Omskaya 36 and Mandarin variety (13.7...14.1 cm) exceeding the other varieties on average by 15...20%. The sprout length of 16.3...16.5 cm was in the standard Omskaya 36 and variety Goplana, exceeding the other studied varieties by 15.9...40.6%. Seed infection in local varieties was present in the form of fungi p. Alternaria - 10...58%, p. Fusarium - 2...7%, Bipolaris sorokiniana - 0...4%, in foreign varieties - only p. Alternaria 0...7%. Grenada, Mandarina, Arabella varieties showed high resistance to root rot at the time of harvesting with disease development 15...36% lower than standard and 40...60% lower than other varieties. Varieties of local selection (Omskaya 36, Grenada, Aviada) exceeded local varieties by Septoria nodorum by 3.0...9.6%, by brown rust Puccinia recondite by 1.0...3.4% of varieties of European selection. Varieties of foreign selection (Goplana, Mandarina, Arabella) exceeded local varieties by Septoria tritici leaf Septoria damage by 1.6...6.1%, and the same susceptibility to stem rust Puccinia graminis 3.0...4.8%. Arabella variety was the best in most structural indicators of yield: the number of grains - 35.8 pcs, weight of grains from 25 plants - 31.3 g, weight of 1000 grains - 39.2 g. The varieties Aviada, Grenada, Arabella, Goplana (3.2...3.6 t/ha) stood out in terms of yield, exceeding the other varieties by 0.2...0.6 t/ha. Gluten and protein content were lower in most foreign varieties compared with domestic ones by 3...8% and 1...3% respectively.

Information about the authors

Vyacheslav Nikolaevich Timofeev, Research Institute of Agriculture of the Northern Trans-Urals - a branch of Federal Research Center of Tyumen Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tyumen, Russia

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, researcher of Plant protection Laboratory,
e-mail: Timofeev_vn2010@mail.ru

Olga Anatolevna Vyushina, Research Institute of Agriculture of the Northern Trans-Urals - a branch of Federal Research Center of Tyumen Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tyumen, Russia.

researcher of Agriculture Department, e-mail: vyushina63@mail.ru

References

 1. Сравнительная оценка сортообразцов яровой мягкой пшеницы по комплексу признаков в условиях центрального района нечерноземной зоны России / И. Н. Ворончихина, В. С. Рубец, В. В. Ворончихин и др. // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2021. Т. 35. № 10. С. 32–38. doi: 10.53859/02352451_2021_35_10_32.

 2. Малов Н. П. Влияние сорта яровой пшеницы на рост и развитие растений // Вестник Казанского ГАУ. 2018. № 3 (50). С. 35–38. doi: 10.12737/article_5bcf5573059500.42622747.

 3. Сакер С., Вертикова Е. А., Хомутова А. А. Сравнительная оценка сортов яровой мягкой пшеницы на урожайность и качество зерна // Международная научно-практическая конференция, посвященная 100-летию открытия закона гомологических рядов и 133-летию со дня рождения академика Н. И. Вавилова. Саратов: изд. ООО «Амирит», С. 235–237.

 4. Балыкин А. А., Шашкаров Л. Г. Влияние протравливания семян и сорта на поражаемость растений яровой пшеницы корневыми гнилями // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. 2019. Т. 14. № 4-2 (56). С. 16–19. doi: 10.12737/2073-0462-2020-16-19.

 5. Management of common root rot and Fusarium foot of wheat using Brassika carinata break crop green manure / V. Campanella, C. Mandala, V. Angileri, et al. // Crop Protection. 2020. Vol. 130. Article 105073. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219419304193?via%3Dihub (дата обращения: 8.06.2022 г.). doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105073.

 6. Moya-Elizondo E. A., Jacobsen B. J. Integrated management of Fusarium crown rot of wheat using fungicide seed treatment, cultivar resistance, and induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR) // Biological Control. 2016. No. 92. P. 153–163.

 7. Влияние сорта и технологии возделывания на формирование фитосанитарной ситуации в посевах яровой пшеницы в лесостепи Приобья / Н. Г. Власенко, О. В. Кулагин, М. Т. Егорычева и др. // Вестник защиты растений. 2018. № 2. С. 21–28.

 8. Никитина В.И., Количенко А.А. Оценка экологической стабильности сортов яровой мягкой пшеницы на сортоучастках Красноярского края // Вестник КрасГАУ. 2019. №3. С. 58–64.

 9. Экологическая пластичность и стабильность сортов мягкой пшеницы в степной зоне Омской области / Д. В. Пушкарев, В. П. Шаманин, Ю. С. Краснова и др. // Вест. ОмГАУ. 2017. №1. С. 535–539.

 10. Дятлова О. Г., Разина А. А. Устойчивость новых сортов яровой пшеницы к корневой гнили // Вестник ИрГСХА. 2018. № 85. С. 14–21.

 11. Козлова Л. М., Носкова Е. Н., Попова Ф. А. Оценка развития болезней зерновых культур при ресурсосберегающих системах обработки почвы и применении биопрепаратов в адаптивно-ландшафтном земледелии // Аграрная наука Евро-Северо-Востока. 2020. Т. 21. №6. С. 721–732. doi: 10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.6.721-732.

 12. Сравнительная характеристика урожайности и качества зерна сортов яровой пшеницы на серых лесных почвах / Е. П. Кондратенко, Е. А. Егушова, А. А. Косолапова и др. // Вестник КрасГАУ. 2016. № 6. С. 105–112.

 1. Voronchikhina IN, Rubets VS, Voronchikhin VV. [Comparative evaluation of spring wheat varieties by the complex of characters in the conditions of the central region of the Non-Black Earth zone of Russia]. Dostizheniya nauki i texniki APK. 2021; (35) 10: 32-38 p. DOI: 10.53859/02352451_2021_35_10_32.

 2. Malov NP [Influence of spring wheat variety on the growth and development of plants]. Vestnik KGAU. 2018; 3 (50): 35-38 p. DOI 10.12737/article_5bcf5573059500.42622747

 3. Saker S, Vertikova EA, Khomutova AA. [Comparative assessment of spring soft wheat varieties for productivity and grain quality]. Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya, posvyashchennaya 100-letiyu otkrytiya zakona gomologicheskikh ryadov i 133-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika N.I.Vavilova. Saratov: izd. OOO “Amirit”. 235-237 p.

 4. Balykin AA, Shashkarov LG [Effect of seed and variety dressing on defeatability of spring wheat plants by root rot]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2019; 14. 4-2 (56): 16 -19 p. DOI: 10.12737/2073-0462-2020-16-19

 5. Campanella V, Mandala C,0 Angileri V. Management of common root rot and Fusarium foot of wheat using Brassika carinata break crop green manure. [Internet]. Crop protection. 2020; Vol. 130. 105073 p. [cited 2022, June 08]. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219419304193?via%3Dihub. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105073.

 6. Moya-Elizondo EA, Jacobsen BJ. Integrated management of Fusarium crown rot of wheat using fungicide seed treatment, cultivar resistance, and induction of systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Biological control. 2016; 92. 153-163 p.

 7. Vlasenko NG, Kulagin OV, Egorycheva MT. [Influence of variety and cultivation technology on the formation of phytosanitary situation in spring wheat crops in Ob forest-steppe zone]. Vestnik zashchity rasteniy. 2018; 2. 21-28 p.

 8. Nikitina VI, Kolichenko AA [Assessment of ecological stability of spring soft wheat varieties in Krasnoyarsk region]. Vestnik KrasGAU. 2019; 3. 58-64 p.

 9. Pushkarev DV, Shamanin VP, Krasnova YuS [Ecological plasticity and stability of soft wheat varieties in the steppe zone of Omsk region]. Vestnik OmGAU. 2017; 1. 535-539 p.

 10. Dyatlova OG, Razina AA. [Resistance of new varieties of spring wheat to root rot]. Vestnik IrGSHA. 2018; 85. 14-21 p.

 11. Kozlova LM, Noskova EN, Popova FA. [Evaluation of the development of diseases of grain crops with resource-saving systems of tillage and the use of biological products in adaptive landscape agriculture]. Agrarnaya nauka Evro-Severo-Vostoka. 2020; Vol.21. 6. 721-732 p. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2020.21.6.721-732

 12. Kondratenko EP, Egushova EA, Kosolapova AA [Comparative characteristics of yield and grain quality of spring wheat varieties on gray forest soils]. Vestnik KrasGAU. 2016; 6. 105-112 p.

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Timofeev В. Н., & Vyushina О. А. (2026). VARIETIES OF SPRING WHEAT OF EUROPEAN ORIGIN IN THE CONDITIONS OF TYUMEN REGION: DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-50-56 УДК 633.11:571.12. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 18(2). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/297

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories