STUDY OF THE DON AUTOCHTHONOUS GRAPE VARIETY TSIMLYANSKY BELYY IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE LOWER DON

DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-23-28 УДК 634.852

Authors

  • Lyudmila Georgievna Naumova
  • Valentina Alekseevna Ganich All-Russian Research Institute of Viticulture and Winemaking named after Ya.I. Potapenko - branch of the Federal Rostov Agricultural Research Center, Novocherkassk, Russia.

Keywords:

grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), ampelographic collection, Don autochthonous grape variety, terms of grape ripeness, productivity, harvest characteristics of grape, wine characteristics

Abstract

The study was carried out in order to assess the agrobiological and uvological indicators of the rare autochthonous Don grape variety Tsimlyansky Belyy, growing in the conditions of the Lower Don, and can be used to expand the raw material resource in the production of quality wines and as a valuable genetic material for grape breeding. The experiments were performed on the ampelographic collection (Rostov region) in 2015-2021, according to generally accepted methods and GOST. The bushes are grafted onto the rootstock Kober 5BB. Varieties are cultivated in a covering culture. It has been established that under these growing conditions, Tsimlyansky Belyy variety has an early ripening period (117 days), and the control variety Sibir'kovyy has an early-middle period ripening of berries (128 days). According to the results of agrobiological surveys, good overwintering and fruitfulness of plants were noted, the percentage of fruiting buds in Tsimlyansky Belyy variety was at the level of 72.7%, and in Sibir'kovyy variety - 66.2%. In terms of the percentage of fruitful shoots and the fruitfulness ratio, the differences were not significant and amounted to 5.8% and 0.1, respectively. The yield of the studied variety Tsimlyansky Belyy was 91 centners/ha, in the control variety - 86 centners/ha. The characteristics of grape were practically at the same level (medium sugar content - 20.6 g/100 cm3 for Tsimlyansky Belyy variety and 20.2 g/100 cm3 for the Sibir'kovyy variety; and the acidity of the varieties was low: Tsimlyansky Belyy - 6.4 g/dm3, Sibir'kovyy - 6.3 g/dm3). The wine from Tsimlyansky Belyy variety has a pale straw color, with a shine, has delicate floral and honey notes in the aroma, turning into the taste. The taste is full and harmonious. Tasting score 8.6 points. Wine from the control variety Sibir'kovyy received a tasting score of 8.7 points. In 2022, Tsimlyansky Belyy grape variety is included in the State Register of Russian varieties approved for use, has a high agrobiological potential in the climatic conditions of the Lower Don region, and can be used to expand the raw material resource in the production of quality wines, and as a valuable genetic material for grape breeding.

Information about the authors

Lyudmila Georgievna Naumova

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, Head of Laboratory of Ampelography and Technological Evaluation of Grape Varieties

Valentina Alekseevna Ganich, All-Russian Research Institute of Viticulture and Winemaking named after Ya.I. Potapenko - branch of the Federal Rostov Agricultural Research Center, Novocherkassk, Russia.

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, leading researcher, Laboratory of Ampelography and
Technological Evaluation of Grape Varieties

References

 1. Failla O. East-West collaboration for grapevine diversity exploration and mobilization of adaptive traits for breeding: a four years story // Vitis –Journal of Grapevine Research. 2015. No. 54. URL: https://ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/VITIS/article/view/4946 (дата обращения: 08.02.2023). doi: 10.5073/vitis.2015.54.special-issue.1-4.

 2. Vitis vinifera L. germplasm diversity: a genetic and ampelometric study in ancient vineyards in the South of Basilicata region (Italy) / T. Labagnara, C. Bergamini, A.R. Caputo, et al. // Vitis – Journal of Grapevine Research. 2018. Vol. 57. No.1. URL: https://ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/VITIS/article/view/8358 (дата обращения: 08.02.2023). doi: 10.5073/vitis.2018.57.1-8.

 3. Field genebank standards for rapevines. / D. Maghradze, E. Maletic, E. Maul, et al. // Vitis. 2015. No. 54. P. 273–279.

 4. Полулях А. А., Волынкин В. А., Лиховской В. В. Генетические ресурсы винограда института «Магарач». Проблемы и перспективы сохранения // Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции. 2017. № 21 (6). C. 608–616. doi: 10.18699/VJ17.276.

 5. Application of Standard Methods for the Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) Phenotypic Diversity Exploration: Phenological Traits / L. Rustioni, G. Cola, S. Fiori, et al. // Acta Hortic. 2014. Vol. 1032. P. 253–260.

 6. Toth-Lencses K., Cocco M., Nemeth G. et al. Phenotyping under extreme weather conditions and microsatellite-based genotyping of some Hungarian grape cultivars // Vitis. 2015. No.54. P. 143–164.

 7. Ройчев В. Взаимодействие «генотип-среда» и наследование количественных признаков в комбинации скрещивания семенного и бессемянного сортов винограда (Vitis vinifera L.) // Труды по прикладной ботанике, генетике и селекции. 2019. № 180(4). С. 99–112. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2019-4-99-112.

 8. Duley G. The impact of temperature on Pinot Noir berry and wine quality in a steeply sloping cool climate vineyard in South Australia // Vitis –Journal of Grapevine Research. 2021. No. 60. P. 169–178. doi: 10.5073/vitis.2021.60.169-178.

 9. Dal Monte G., Labagnara T., Cirigliano P. Agroclimatic evaluation of Val d’Agri (Basilicata, Italy) suitability for grapevine quality: the example of PDO «Terre dell’Alta Val d’Agri» area in a climate change scenario // Italian Journal of Agrometeorology. 2019. No. 3. P. 3–12. doi: 10.13128/ijam-797.

 10. Van Leeuwen C., Destract-Irvine A. Modified grape composition under climate change conditions requires adaptation in the vineyard // OENO One. 2017. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 147–154. doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2016.0.0.1647.

 11. Novikova L. Y., Naumova L. G. Dependence of fresh grapes and wine taste scores on the origin of varieties and weather conditions of the harvest year in the northern zone of industrial viticulture in Russia // Agronomy. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 10. Article 10101613. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/10/1613 (дата обращения: 08.02.2023). doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101613.

 12. Ампелография аборигенных и местных сортов винограда Крыма: монография / В. В. Лиховской, А. А. Зармаев, А. А. Полулях и др. Симферополь: ООО «Форма», 2018. 140 с.

 13. Влияние обработки салициловой кислотой на развитие виноградных саженцев / Н. Г. Павлюченко, С. И. Мельникова, О. И. Колесникова и др. // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. 2022. Т. 17. № 3 (67). С. 24–30. doi: 10.12737/2073-0462-2022-24-30

 14. Гельмбрехт Л. К. Цимлянский белый. Ампелография СССР. Т. 6. М.: Пищепромиздат, 1956. С. 172–179.

 15. Донские аборигенные сорта винограда / А.М. Алиев, Л.В. Кравченко, Л.Г. Наумова, В.А. Ганич. Изд. 2-е, перераб. и доп. Новочеркасск: Колорит, 2013. 132 с.

 16. Лазаревский М. А. Изучение сортов винограда. Ростов-на-Дону: Изд-во Ростовского ун-та, 1963. 152 с.

 1. Failla O. East-West collaboration for grapevine diversity exploration and mobilization of adaptive traits for breeding: a four years story. [Internet]. Vitis – Journal of Grapevine Research. 2015; 54. [cited 2023, February 8]. Available from: https://ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/VITIS/article/view/4946. doi: 10.5073/vitis.2015.54.special-issue.1-4.

 2. Labagnara T, Bergamini C, Caputo AR. Vitis vinifera L. germplasm diversity: a genetic and ampelometric study in ancient vineyards in the South of Basilicata region (Italy). [Internet]. Vitis – Journal of Grapevine Research. 2018; Vol.57.1. [cited 2023, February 8]. Available from: https://ojs.openagrar.de/index.php/VITIS/article/view/8358. doi: 10.5073/vitis.2018.57.1-8.

 3. Maghradze D, Maletic E, Maul E. Field genebank standards for rapevines. Vitis. 2015; 54. 273-279 p.

 4. Polulyakh AA, Volynkin VA, Likhovskoy VV. [Genetic resources of grapes of Magarach Institute. Problems and prospects of conservation]. Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selektsii. 2017; 21(6). 608-616 p. doi: 10.18699/VJ17.276.

 5. Rustioni L, Cola G, Fiori S. Application of standard methods for the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) phenotypic diversity exploration: phenological traits. Acta Hortic. 2014; Vol.1032. 253-260 p.

 6. Toth-Lencses K, Cocco M, Nemeth G. Phenotyping under extreme weather conditions and microsatellite-based genotyping of some Hungarian grape cultivars. Vitis. 2015; 54. 143-164 p.

 7. Roichev V. [Interaction “genotype-environment” and the inheritance of quantitative traits in the combination of crossing seed and seedless grape varieties (Vitis vinifera L.)]. Trudy po prikladnoi botanike, genetike i selektsii. 2019; 180 (4). 99-112. doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2019-4-99-112.

 8. Duley G. The impact of temperature on Pinot Noir berry and wine quality in a steeply sloping cool climate vineyard in South Australia. Vitis - Journal of Grapevine Research. 2021; 60. 169-178 p. doi: 10.5073/vitis.2021.60.169-178.

 9. Dal Monte G, Labagnara T, Cirigliano P. Agroclimatic evaluation of Val d’Agri (Basilicata, Italy) suitability for grapevine quality: the example of PDO “Terre dell’Alta Val d’Agri” area in a climate change scenario. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology. 2019; 3. 3-12 p. doi: 10.13128/ijam-797.

 10. Van Leeuwen C, Destract-Irvine A. Modified grape composition under climate change conditions requires adaptation in the vineyard. OENO One. 2017; Vol.51. 2. 147-154 p. doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2016.0.0.1647.

 11. Novikova LY, Naumova LG. Dependence of fresh grapes and wine taste scores on the origin of varieties and weather conditions of the harvest year in the northern zone of industrial viticulture in Russia. [Internet]. Agronomy. 2020; Vol.10. 10. Article 10101613. [cited 2023, February 8]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/10/10/1613. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10101613.

 12. Likhovskoi VV, Zarmaev AA, Polulyakh AA. Ampelografiya aborigennykh i mestnykh sortov vinograda Kryma: monografiya. [Ampelography of indigenous and local grape varieties of Crimea: monograph]. Simferopol': OOO “Forma”. 2018; 140 p.

 13. Pavlyuchenko NG, Mel'nikova SI, Kolesnikova OI. [Effect of salicylic acid treatment on the development of grape seedlings]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022; Vol.17. 3(67). 24-30 p. doi: 10.12737/2073-0462-2022-24-30

 14. Gel'mbrekht LK. Tsimlyanskii belyi. Ampelografiya SSSR. [Tsimlyansky white. Ampelography of the USSR]. Vol.6. Moscow: Pishchepromizdat. 1956; 172-179 p.

 15. Aliev AM, Kravchenko LV, Naumova LG, Ganich VA. Donskie aborigennye sorta vinograda: izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. [Don native grape varieties: 2nd edition, revised and added]. Novocherkassk: Kolorit. 2013; 132 p.

 16. Lazarevskiy MA. Izuchenie sortov vinograda. [Study of grape varieties]. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo Rostovskogo un-ta. 1963; 152 p.

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Naumova Л. Г., & Ganich В. А. (2026). STUDY OF THE DON AUTOCHTHONOUS GRAPE VARIETY TSIMLYANSKY BELYY IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE LOWER DON: DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-23-28 УДК 634.852 . Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 18(1). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/258

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories