INFLUENCE OF COPPER-CONTAINING AGROCHEMICAL ON GRAPE PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS

DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-5-11 УДК 634.8:631.82

Authors

  • Natalya Olegovna Arestova
  • Irina Olegovna Ryabchun All-Russian Research Institute of Viticulture and Winemaking named after Ya.I.Potapenko - branch of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Federal Rostov Agricultural Research Center, Novocherkassk, Russia.

Keywords:

grapes (Vitis), copper-containing agrochemical, biological efficiency, productivity, sugar content, acidity of berries, mildew

Abstract

The studies were carried out to determine the biological effectiveness and fungicidal activity of the copper-containing agrochemical, as well as its effect on productivity of grape plants. The work was carried out in Rostov region in 2019-2021 on fruit-bearing grape plants of the Cabernet Sauvignon variety. The experiment scheme included the following options: without top dressing (control); copper-containing agrochemical (3-fold foliar feeding) at doses of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 l/ha. The first feeding was carried out after flowering, the second and third - 20 and 40 days after the first. Top dressing was carried out in the morning or evening hours in the absence of precipitation and gusts of wind. The consumption of the working solution is 1000 l/ha. The repetition of the experiment is three times. The most significant increase in the mass of bunches from one bush, compared with the control, was noted in the variant with a dose of 0.5 l/ha. A significant increase in the number of berries in a bunch and their weight was noted in the variants with top dressing at doses of 0.5 and 1.0 l/ha. A significant increase in the average weight of one berry, compared with the control, was noted in all variants of the experiment. The productivity of plants when using the drug at a dose of 1.5 l/ha was greater than in the control, but less than in other variants of the experiment. The most significant increase in the yield of grape bushes of the Cabernet Sauvignon variety (by 26.2%), compared with the control, was noted with top dressing at a dose of 0.5 l/ha. The concentration of sugars in the juice of berries at all doses of top dressing was significantly higher (by 0.7...1.0 g/100 cm2) than in the control. Fertilizing grape plants at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 l/ha increased the resistance of plants to mildew, compared with the control, especially at a dose of 1.5 l/ha. To increase the productivity of grape plants, it is advisable to use a copper-containing agrochemical at doses of 0.5 and 1.0 l/ha. To reduce the pesticide load against the background of protective treatments against mildew, it is recommended to use the drug at a dose of 1.5 l/ha.

Information about the authors

Natalya Olegovna Arestova

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, associate professor, leading researcher

Irina Olegovna Ryabchun, All-Russian Research Institute of Viticulture and Winemaking named after Ya.I.Potapenko - branch of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Federal Rostov Agricultural Research Center, Novocherkassk, Russia.

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, Deputy Director for Research

References

 1. Клименко О.Е., Клименко Н.Н., Клименко Н.И. Влияние биологизации на состояние почвы, минеральное питание и продуктивность винограда // Садоводство и виноградарство. 2021. № 5. С. 26‒35.

 2. Martensson A. Nutrient balance and fertilizer use efficiency in Swedish Vineyards // International Journal of Wine Research. 2020. No. 12. P. 17–21. doi: 10.2147/IJWR.S256529.

 3. Удобрения виноградников: виды, сроки, дозы и нормы внесения / В.А. Монастырский, А.Н. Бабичев, А.А. Бабенко и др. // Мелиорация и гидротехника. 2022. Т. 12. № 4. С. 265‒285.

 4. Влияние условий выращивания на нутриентный состав винограда столовых сортов в Дагестане / О.К. Власова, З.К. Бахмулаева, Т.И. Даудова и др. // Вестник НГАУ. 2020. № 4 (57). С. 7‒15.

 5. Полухина Е.В., Власенко М.В. Эффективный метод управления продукционным процессом винограда с использованием некорневого питания в аридных условиях Северо-Западного Прикаспия // Аграрный вестник Урала. 2020. № 3 (194). С. 36–44.

 6. Зарипова К.Ф., Раджабов А.К. Результаты испытания гелевых удобрений нового поколения в условиях горно-долинного Крыма на столовом сорте винограда Италия // Известия ТСХА. 2022 (1). С. 5‒11.

 7. Mixtures of macro and micronutrients control grape powdery mildew and alter berry metabolites / L. Gur, Y. Cohen, O. Frenkel, et al. // Plants. 2022. Vol. 11. No. 7. P. 978. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070978 (дата обращения: 02.09.2022).

 8. Kovaсiс G.R., Lesnik M., Vrsic S. An overview of the copper situation and usage in viticulture // Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013. Vol. 19. P. 50–59.

 9. Factors affecting distribution and mobility of trace elements (Cu, Pb, Zn) in a perennial grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in the Champagne region of France / E. I. B. Chopin, B. Marin, R. Mkoungafoko, et al. // Environmental Pollution 2008. Vol. 156. P. 1092–1098. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.015.

 10. Влияние наночастиц железа, цинка, меди на некоторые показатели роста растений перца / Г.С. Нечитайло, О.А. Богословская, И.П. Ольховская и др. // Российские нанотехнологии. 2018. Т. 13. № 3-4. С. 57‒63.

 11. The Impact of Trace Elements Applied with PGPB on the Vitis vinifera L Seedlings Resistance to the Copper Excess in Soil / S. Veliksar, N. Lemanova, M. Gladei, et al. // International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science (SSRG-IJAES). 2019. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 43–47.

 12. Влияние микроэлементов и ростостимулирующих бактерий на устойчивость винограда к избытку меди в почве / С. Г. Великсар, Н. Б. Леманова, М. А. Гладей и др. // Агрохимия. 2018. № 6. С. 68–76.

 13. Gluhic D. Copper fertilizers in fertilization of grapes // Glasnik Zastite Bilja, 2021. Vol. 44. No. 5. P. 60–64. doi: 10.31727/gzb.44.5.8.

 14. Navel A., Martins J. M. Effect of long term organic amendments and vegetation of vineyard soils on the microscale distribution and biogeochemistry of copper // Science of the Total Environment, 2014. Vol. 466. P. 681-689. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.064.

 15. Червяк С.Н., Бойко В.А., Левченко С.В. Влияние некорневой подкормки растений на фенольную зрелость винограда и качественные характеристики виноматериалов // Садоводство и виноградарство. 2019. № 4. С. 30–36.

 16. Влияние удобрений некорневого действия на хозяйственно-ценные показатели столовых сортов винограда / Е. В. Полухина, Е. Н. Иваненко, Д. Е. Морозов и др. // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса: Наука и высшее профессиональное образование. 2018. № 4 (52). С. 185–191.

 17. Arestova N. O., Ryabchun I. O. Pesticide load reducing in vineyard protection from powdery mildew // E3S Web of Conferences. 14th International Scientific and Practical Conference on State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness, Interagromash 2021. Rostov-on-Don, 2021. P. 01001. URL: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2020/70/e3sconf_itse2020_05001/e3sconf_its e2020_05001.html (дата обращения: 02.09.2022).

 1. Klimenko OE, Klimenko NN, Klimenko NI. [Influence of biologization on soil condition, mineral nutrition and productivity of grapes]. Sadovodstvo i vinogradarstvo. 2021; 5. 26-35 p.

 2. Martensson A. Nutrient balance and fertilizer use efficiency in Swedish Vineyards. International Journal of Wine Research. 2020; 12. 17-21 p. doi: 10.2147/IJWR.S256529.

 3. Monastyrskiy VA, Babichev AN, Babenko AA. [Vineyard fertilizers: types, terms, doses and application rates]. Melioratsiya i gidrotekhnika. 2022; Vol.12. 4. 265-285 p.

 4. Vlasova OK, Bakhmulaeva ZK, Daudova TI. [Influence of growing conditions on the nutrient composition of table grapes in Dagestan]. Vestnik NGAU. 2020; 4 (57). 7-15 p.

 5. Polukhina EV, Vlasenko MV. [An effective method for managing the grapes production process using foliar nutrition in the arid conditions of the North-Western Caspian region]. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala. 2020; 3 (194). 36-44 p.

 6. Zaripova KF, Radzhabov AK. [Results of testing gel fertilizers of a new generation in the conditions of the mountain-valley Crimea on the table grape variety Italy]. Izvestiya TSKhA. 2022; (1). 5-11 p.

 7. Gur L, Cohen Y, Frenkel O. Mixtures of macro and micronutrients control grape powdery mildew and alter berry metabolites. [Interet]. Plants. 2022; Vol.11. 7. 978 p. [cited 2022, September 2]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11070978.

 8. Kovasis GR, Lesnik M, Vrsic S. An overview of the copper situation and usage in viticulture. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2013; Vol.19. 50-59 p.

 9. Chopin EIB, Marin B, Mkoungafoko R. Factors affecting distribution and mobility of trace elements (Cu, Pb, Zn) in a perennial grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in the Champagne region of France. Environmental Pollution 2008; Vol.156. 1092-1098 p. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.04.015.

 10. Nechitaylo GS, Bogoslovskaya OA, Ol'khovskaya IP. [Influence of nanoparticles of iron, zinc, copper on some parameters of growth of pepper plants]. Rossiiskie nanotekhnologii. 2018; Vol.13. 3-4. 57-63 p.

 11. Veliksar S, Lemanova N, Gladey M. The impact of trace elements applied with PGPB on the Vitis vinifera L seedlings resistance to the copper excess in soil. International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Science (SSRG-IJAES). 2019; Vol.6. 4. 43-47 p.

 12. Veliksar SG, Lemanova NB, Gladey MA. [Influence of microelements and growth-promoting bacteria on the resistance of grapes to excess copper in the soil]. Agrokhimiya. 2018; 6. 68-76 p.

 13. Gluhic D. Copper fertilizers in fertilization of grapes. Glasnik Zastite Bilja. 2021; Vol.44. 5. 60-64 p. doi: 10.31727/gzb.44.5.8.

 14. Navel A, Martins JM. Effect of long term organic amendments and vegetation of vineyard soils on the microscale distribution and biogeochemistry of copper. Science of the total environment. 2014; Vol.466. 681-689 p. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.064.

 15. Chervyak SN, Boyko VA, Levchenko SV. [Influence of foliar feeding of plants on the phenolic maturity of grapes and the qualitative characteristics of wine materials]. Sadovodstvo i vinogradarstvo. 2019; 4. 30-36 p.

 16. Polukhina EV, Ivanenko EN, Morozov DE. [Influence of foliar fertilizers on economically valuable indicators of table grapes]. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: Nauka i vysshee professional'noe obrazovanie. 2018; 4 (52). 185-191 p.

 17. Arestova NO, Ryabchun IO. Pesticide load reducing in vineyard protection from powdery mildew. [Internet]. E3S Web of Conferences. 14th International scientific and practical conference on state and prospects for the development of agribusiness, Interagromash 2021. Rostov-on-Don. 2021; 01001 p. [cited 2022, September 2]. Available from: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2020/70/e3sconf_itse2020_05001/e3sconf_its e2020_05001.html.

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Arestova Н. О., & Ryabchun И. О. (2026). INFLUENCE OF COPPER-CONTAINING AGROCHEMICAL ON GRAPE PRODUCTIVITY INDICATORS: DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-5-11 УДК 634.8:631.82. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 18(1). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/255

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories