MANIFESTATION OF “PLANT HEIGHT” SIGN OF WINTER WHEAT DEPENDING ON PRECITATION IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE NON-BLACK SOIL ZONE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON PRODUCTIVITY

DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-26-32 УДК 633.111.1:631.559.2

Authors

  • Olga Viktorovna Gladysheva
  • Olga Viktorovna Levakova
  • Margarita Igorevna Kostanyants Institute of Seed Production and Agrotechnologies - branch of Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center of VIM, Ryazan region, Russia.

Keywords:

winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), variety, precipitation, plant height, lodging, yield.

Abstract

The research was carried out in order to identify the response of the trait plant height of winter wheat varieties to moisture conditions during the growing season. The work was carried out in 2010-2020 in Ryazan region. The object of the study was 9 varieties of winter soft wheat: Zarya, Inna, Pamyati Fedina, Moskovskaya 39, Angelina, Moskovskaya 56, Viola, Danaya, Felitsiya. The studies were carried out on a natural background in the nursery of competitive variety testing on plots of 10.0 m2. The soil of the experimental plot is dark gray forest, heavy loamy, of medium fertility. The main part of the varieties was included in the group of undersized (80 ... 100 cm) and only Zarya variety, which has a height of 104 cm, is classified as medium. The difference between the minimum and maximum plant heights of the studied varieties, which varied from 30 cm (Felitsiya) to 45 cm (Inna), indicates the dependence of this indicator on the growing conditions. The reliability of differences between the effects of genotypes, environments and their interactions has been established. The greatest contribution (43.8%) to the dispersion of plant height was made by the "genotype×environment" interaction, the contribution of the genotype was 38.0%, of the environment – 8.9%. A close negative relationship was found between lodging resistance and plant height (r=-0.779). The most resistant to lodging varieties are Angelina, Viola, Danae and Felicia (8.0 points or more). The yield of modern varieties Viola, Danaya and Felitsiya (6.27 ... 7.02 t/ha) with the same technology is 30 ... 45% higher. Significant varietal differences were found in the effect of precipitation in autumn and spring-summer periods on plant height. A weak and medium inverse relationship was noted between plant height and September precipitation (r=-0.338…-0.739), as well as a very weak to moderate direct relationship with precipitation in the first decade of October (r=+0.172…+0.588) and a direct relationship with total precipitation in May (r=+0.121…+0.859), especially in the second decade (r=+0.367…+0.643).

Information about the authors

Olga Viktorovna Gladysheva

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, Branch Director, e-mail: gladyshevaov@yandex.ru

Olga Viktorovna Levakova

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, leading researcher of Breeding and Seed Production Depart
ment, e-mail: levakova.olga@bk.ru

Margarita Igorevna Kostanyants , Institute of Seed Production and Agrotechnologies - branch of Federal Scientific Agroengineering Center of VIM, Ryazan region, Russia.

junior researcher, Breeding and Seed Production Department, e-mail: margo
bannickova@yandex.ru

References

 1. Усенко С. В., Усенко В. И., Гаркуша А. А. Эффективность приемов обработки почвы и средств интенсификации на яровой пшенице в зависимости от метеоусловий и предшественника в лесостепи Алтайского Приобья // Земледелие. 2019. № 5. С. 16–21. doi: 10.24411/0044-3913-2019-10504.

 2. Семенихина Ю. А., Камбулов С. И. Влаготемпературный режим почвы при возделывании озимой пшеницы // Научная жизнь. 2019. Т. 14. № 3 (91). С. 269–278. doi: 10.26088/INOB.2019.91.29681.

 3. Influence of traditional technology and direct sowing the winter wheat on agrophysical factors of fertility the dark chestnut soils / I. A. Volters, O. I. Vlasov, V. M. Perederieva, et al. // Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 718–726.

 4. Response of winter oilseed rape to differentiated foliar fertilization / Р. Żarczyński, S. Sienkiewicz, J. Wierzbowska, et al. // Agricultural and Food Science. 2021. Vol. 30. No.1. Р. 36–42. doi: 10.23986/afsci.101280.

 5. Productivity of various barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars under semi-arid conditions in southern Russia / M. Zargar, G. Bodner, A. Tumanyan, et al // Agronomy Research. 2018. Vol. 16. No. 5. Р. 2242–2253. doi: 10.15159/AR.18.176.

 6. Selection of high-yield maize hybrid under different cropping systems based on stability and adaptability parameters / D. Ruswandi, E. Azizah, H. Maulan, et al. // Open Agriculture. 2022. Vol. 7. No. 1. Р. 161–170. doi: 10.1515/opag-2022-0073.

 7. McCabe C. P., Burke J. I. Oat (Avena sativa) yield and grain fill responses to varying agronomic and weather factors // The journal of Agricultural Sciece. 2021. Vol. 159. No. 1-2. Р. 90–105. doi: 10.1017/S0021859621000320.

 8. Агеева Е.В., Леонова И.Н., Лихенко И.Е. Полегание пшеницы: генетические и экологические факторы и способы преодоления // Вавиловский журнал генетики и селекции. 2020. № 24 (4). С. 356–362. doi: 10.18699/VJ20.628.

 9. Левакова О.В., Банникова М.И. Анализ генетических источников ценных признаков сортов озимой мягкой пшеницы в целях создания исходного материала // Аграрная наука. 2019. № 7-8. С. 38–40. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2019-330-7-38-40.

 10. Вошедский, Н. Н. Особенности влияния отдельных технологических приёмов на водопотребление и урожайность новых сортов озимой пшеницы в Ростовской области / Н. Н. Вошедский, В. А. Кулыгин // Достижения науки и техники АПК. – 2022. – Т. 36, № 9. – С. 26-31. – DOI 10.53859/02352451_2022_36_9_26.

 11. Противоэрозионная мелиорация в Республике Татарстан / М. М. Хисматуллин, А. Р. Валиев, М. М. Хисматуллин [и др.] // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. – 2022. – Т. 17, № 2 (66). – С. 47-54. – DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2022-45-52.

 12. Галушко, Н. А. Адаптивность сортов озимой пшеницы, возделываемых в условиях Северо-Кавказского региона / Н. А. Галушко, Н. И. Соколенко // Достижения науки и техники АПК. – 2022. – Т. 36, № 5. – С. 50-54. – DOI 10.53859/02352451_2022_36_5_50.

 1. Usenko SV, Usenko VI, Garkusha AA. [Efficiency of tillage methods and means of intensification on spring wheat depending on weather conditions and predecessor in the forest-steppe of Altai and Ob region]. Zemledelie. 2019; 5. 16-21. doi: 10.24411/0044-3913-2019-10504.

 2. Semenikhina YuA, Kambulov SI. [Moisture and temperature regime of the soil during winter wheat cultivation]. Nauchnaya zhizn'. 2019; Vol.14. 3 (91). 269-278 p. doi: 10.26088/INOB.2019.91.29681.

 3. Volters IA, Vlasov OI, Perederieva VM. Influence of traditional technology and direct sowing the winter wheat on agrophysical factors of fertility the dark chestnut soils. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences. 2018; Vol.9. 4. 718-726 p.

 4. Żarczyński R, Sienkiewicz S, Wierzbowska J. Response of winter oilseed rape to differentiated foliar fertilization. Agricultural and Food Science. 2021; Vol.30. 1. 36-42 p. doi: 10.23986/afsci.101280.

 5. Zargar M, Bodner G, Tumanyan A. Productivity of various barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars under semi-arid conditions in southern Russia. Agronomy Research. 2018; Vol.16. 5. 2242-2253 p. doi: 10.15159/AR.18.176.

 6. Ruswandi D, Azizah E, Maulan H. Selection of high-yield maize hybrid under different cropping systems based on stability and adaptability parameters. Open Agriculture. 2022; Vol.7. 1. 161-170 p. doi: 10.1515/opag-2022-0073.

 7. McCabe CP, Burke JI. Oat (Avena sativa) yield and grain fill responses to varying agronomic and weather factors. The journal of Agricultural Science. 2021; Vol.159. 1-2. 90-105 p. doi: 10.1017/S0021859621000320.

 8. Ageeva EV, Leonova IN, Likhenko IE. [Wheat lodging: genetic and environmental factors and ways to overcome]. Vavilovskiy zhurnal genetiki i selektsii. 2020; 24 (4). 356-362 p. doi: 10.18699/VJ20.628.

 9. Levakova OV, Bannikova MI. [Analysis of genetic sources of valuable traits of winter soft wheat varieties in order to create source material]. Agrarnaya nauka. 2019; 7-8. 38-40 p. doi: 10.32634/0869-8155-2019-330-7-38-40.

 10. Voshedsky NN, Kulygin VA. [Features of the influence of certain technological techniques on water consumption and yield of new varieties of winter wheat in the Rostov region]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2022; Vol. 36. 9. 26-31 p. – DOI 10.53859/02352451_2022_36_9_26.

 11. Hismatullin MM, Valiev AR, Hismatullin MM, Mukhametgaliev FN, Asadullin NM, Ullah R. [Anti-erosion reclamation in the Republic of Tatarstan]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022; Vol. 17. No. 2 (66). 47-54 p.

 12. Galushko NA, Sokolenko NI. [Adaptability of winter wheat varieties cultivated in the conditions of the North Caucasus region]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2022; Vol. 36. 5. 50-54 p. – DOI 10.53859/02352451_2022_36_5_50.

Published

2026-07-22

How to Cite

Gladysheva О. В., Levakova О. В., & Kostanyants М. И. (2026). MANIFESTATION OF “PLANT HEIGHT” SIGN OF WINTER WHEAT DEPENDING ON PRECITATION IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE NON-BLACK SOIL ZONE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON PRODUCTIVITY: DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-26-32 УДК 633.111.1:631.559.2 . Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 18(3). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/223

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories