ASSESSMENT OF THE INFLUENCE OF FACTORS ON THE DYNAMICS OF LIVESTOCK DISTRIBUTION BY REGIONS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2024-139-145 УДК 631.1
Keywords:
livestock farming, dynamics of changes in livestock numbers, structure of farm categories, rating of regions, socio-economic development, quality of life.Abstract
Changes in the number of livestock in the regions of the Russian Federation are uneven; according to Rosstat, in 2021 the number of livestock increased compared to 1991 only in three republics - Dagestan, Tyva and Altai. In the process of studying the dynamics of livestock in the regions of the Russian Federation, an assessment was made of the influence on the region's place in the Russian Federation in terms of livestock in 2021 of various factors such as: the number of livestock in the region in 1991 (starting conditions); livestock growth rate; distribution of livestock by farm categories; ranking of regions by socio-economic status and quality of life. The ranking position of the Russian region in terms of total livestock in 2021 is largely unchanged compared to 1991, with the exception of its position, distributed according to the growth rate of livestock in the region. The distribution of livestock by farm category does not have a significant impact on the total number of livestock in the region. However, the study showed that in such categories of farms as agricultural organizations and households, the growth rate of livestock is higher, the higher the position of the region in terms of livestock in the corresponding category of farms. In the process of studying socio-economic factors on changes in livestock numbers in the region, it was revealed that the development of the livestock industry in the regions is not the basis for the well-being of the territory. When assessing the relationship between the number of livestock and the quality of life of the population, it was revealed that the growth of livestock occurs in regions not with the highest level of economic well-being.
References
1. Выявление структур крупных экономических систем с использованием методов рейтингования / Ю. В. Вертакова, Е. И. Зуга, В. А. Плотников, С. И. Шаныгин // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. – 2022. – Т. 233, № 1. – С. 259-281. – DOI 10.38197/2072-2060-2022-233-1-259-281.
2. Зорин, Г. Е. Создание государственно-частной аналитики как направления развития ранжирования регионов Российской Федерации / Г. Е. Зорин // Russian Journal of Management. – 2022. – Т. 10, № 4. – С. 222-239.
3. Люкевич, И. Н. Системная социально-экономическая диагностика мегарегиона арктической зоны российской Федерации / И. Н. Люкевич, А. С. Микуленок // Экономические науки. – 2023. – № 218. – С. 67-83. – DOI 10.14451/1.218.146.
4. Fan, Y. H. “CRITERIA FOR RANKING OF NATION-STATES THROUGH REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE EVALUATION.” The American Economist, vol. 60, no. 2, 2015, pp. 162–75. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43664861. Accessed 31 July 2023.
5. Estevão, João & Dias Lopes, Jose & Penela, Daniela & Soares, José. (2019). The Doing Business ranking and the GDP. A qualitative study. Journal of Business Research. 115. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.067.
6. Рейтинг социально-экономического положения регионов по итогам 2021 г. URL: https://riarating.ru/infografika/20220516/630222174.html (дата обращения: 29.07.2023).
7.Рейтинг регионов по качеству жизни – 2021. URL:https://riarating.ru/infografika/20220215/630216951.html (дата обращения: 29.07.2023).
8. Герцикова Ингрид. История становления крестьянского (фермерского) хозяйства в России / Ингрид Герцикова, Т.Г. Чебоньян. — Текст: непосредственный // Молодой ученый. — 2021. — № 40 (382). — С. 84-86. — URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/382/84404/ (дата обращения: 29.07.2023).
9. Jiamiao Yang, Yanwen Wang, Hao Zhang Impact of socio-economic and environmental factors on livestock production in Kyrgyzstan. JOURNAL={Frontiers in Environmental Science}, VOLUME={10}, YEAR={2022},URL={https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1049187}, DOI={10.3389/fenvs.2022.1049187}, ISSN={2296-665X, Accessed 31 July 2023.
10. Специализация и локализация сельскохозяйственного производства в Российской Федерации в 1990-2020 годы / Р. А. Мигунов, Н. В. Арзамасцева, А. А. Сюткина, И. Д. Суетин // АПК: экономика, управление. – 2023. – № 10. – С. 21-30. – DOI 10.33305/2310-21.
11. Кудрявцева, Л. Н. Развитие мясного скотоводства в регионах и его ресурсное обеспечение / Л. Н. Кудрявцева // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. – 2018. – № 4. – С. 71-76.
12. Китаев, Ю. А. Тенденции развития молочного скотоводства в России / Ю. А. Китаев // Вестник Воронежского государственного аграрного университета. – 2020. – Т. 13, № 3(66). – С. 182-187. – DOI 10.17238/issn2071-2243.2020.3.182
1. Vertakova YuV, Zuga EI, Plotnikov VA, Shanygin SI. [Identification of the structures of large economic systems using rating methods]. Nauchnye trudy Volnogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii. 2022; Vol.233. 1. 259-281 p. – DOI 10.38197/2072-2060-2022-233-1-259-281.
2. Zorin GE. [Creation of public-private analytics as a direction for the development of ranking regions of the Russian Federation]. Russian Journal of Management. 2022; Vol.10. 4. 222-239 p.
3. Lyukevich IN, Mikulenok AS. [Systematic social and economic diagnostics of the megaregion of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation]. Ekonomicheskie nauki. 2023; 218. 67-83 p. – DOI 10.14451/1.218.146.
4. Fan YH. Criteria for ranking of nation-states through regional knowledge evaluation. The American Economist. 2015; Vol.60. 2. 162-175 p. JSTOR, [cited 2023, July 31]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43664861.
5. Estevao Joao & Dias Lopes, Jose & Penela, Daniela & Soares, Jose. The doing business ranking and the GDP. A qualitative study. Journal of Business Research. 2019; 115. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.067.
6. Rating of the social and economic situation of regions based on the results of 2021. [Internet]. RIA Rating. [cited 2023, July 29]. Available from: https://riarating.ru/infografika/20220516/630222174.html.
7. Rating of regions by quality of life - 2021. [Internet]. RIA Rating. [cited 2023, July 29]. Available from: https://riarating.ru/infografika/20220215/630216951.html.
8. Gertsikova Ingrid, Chebonyan TG. [The history of peasant (farm) farming formation in Russia]. Molodoi uchenyi. 2021; 40 (382). 84-86 p. [cited 2023, July 29]. Available from: https://moluch.ru/archive/382/84404/.
9. Jiamiao Yang, Yanwen Wang, Hao Zhang Impact of social and economic and environmental factors on livestock production in Kyrgyzstan. [Internet]. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022; Vol.10. [cited 2023, July 31]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1049187, DOI 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1049187, ISSN 2296-665X.
10. Migunov RA, Arzamastseva NV, Syutkina AA, Suetin ID. [Specialization and localization of agricultural production in the Russian Federation in 1990-2020]. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie. 2023; 10. 21-30 p. – DOI 10.33305/2310-21.
11. Kudryavtseva LN. [Development of beef cattle breeding in the regions and its resource support]. Ekonomika selskogo khozyaystva Rossii. 2018; 4. 71-76 p.
12. Kitaev YuA. [Development trends in the dairy cattle breeding in Russia]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2020; Vol.13. 3 (66). 182-187 p. – DOI 10.17238/issn2071-2243.2020.3.182.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
