INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS ON THE EFFICIENCY OF CO2 CAPTURE FROM ATMOSPHERE AND ITS FIXATION IN THE BIOMASS OF PEAS (PISUMSATIVUM)
DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2023-24-29 УДК 631.8:631.9
Keywords:
climate change, carbon dioxide capturing, green manure, carbon balance in soil, pea (Pisum sativum).Abstract
The negative consequences of global climate change are widely known, in particular leading to a decrease in soil fertility and a decrease in the efficiency of crop production. In connection with the above, approaches to greening agriculture are constantly being developed, which should lead to improved soil quality, preservation and increase in the amount of nutrients in it, as well as a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. One of these approaches may be the use of peas as ground cover plants to reduce CO2 emissions from bulk soil, due to the fixation of C in phytomass, which will later be plowed into the soil. To evaluate the effectiveness of this approach, a vegetation experiment was conducted in a greenhouse under different temperature conditions (20°C, 25°C, 30°C) with soil on which pea plants (Pisum sativum) were grown and soil without plants (imitation of open arable land). In the dynamics of the experiment, indicators characterizing the process of carbon accumulation in phytomass were assessed, namely the rate of increase in plant phytomass and chlorophyll content in leaves, as well as the process characterizing CO2 emission from the soil - an increase in the intensity of soil basal respiratory activity under peas over that of bulk soil. Next, the carbon balance was calculated for each temperature regime. It was shown that with an increase in temperature from 20°C to 30°C, there is a decrease in C fixation in plant phytomass and a decrease in CO2 emission due to the respiratory activity of the soil microbial community. The maximum fixation of C when growing peas (Pisum sativum) was established for a temperature regime of 20°C and amounted to 585 kg C/ha.
References
1. Food Security / C.Mbow, C.Rosenzweig, L.G.Barioni,et al. Germany, Potsdam: Institut fur Klimafolgenforschung, 2019.550c.
2. Agriculture’s Contribution to Climate Change and Role in Mitigation Is Distinct From Predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors / J.Lynch, M.Cain, D.Frame,et al. // Front. Sustain. FoodSyst. 2021. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039/full (дата обращения: 05.09.2023).
3. Сафин, Р. И. Современное состояние и перспективы развития углеродного земледелия в Республике Татарстан / Р. И. Сафин, А. Р. Валиев, В. А. Колесар // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. – 2021. – Т. 16, № 3(63). – С. 7-13.
4. Об утверждении перечня парниковых газов, в отношении которых осуществляется государственный учет выбросов парниковых газов и ведение кадастра парниковых газов: Распоряжение Правительства Российской Федерации от 22.10.2021№2979-р //Рос. газ. 2021. 7 июля.
5. PhillipsC.L., NickersonN. Soil Respiration Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences: моногр. Denmark: Elsevier, 2015. 20 p.
6. Jayawardena D.M., Heckathorn S.A., Boldt J.K. A meta-analysis of the combined effects of elevated carbon dioxide and chronic warming on plant %N, protein content and N-uptake rate // AoB Plants. 2021URL: https://academic.oup.com/aobpla/article/13/4/plab031/6284301 (дата обращения: 05.09.2023).
7. Encouraging adoption of green manure technology to produce clean rice product / N.Valizadeh, S.Jalilian, Z.Hallaj,et al. // Sci. Rep. 2023. URL: http://www.voennoepravo.ru/node/2149 (датаобращения: 05.09.2023).
8. The potential of green manure to increase soil carbon sequestration and reduce the yield-scaled carbon footprint of rice production in southern China / S.Gao, S.Li, G.Zhou,et al. // J. Integr. Agric. 2022. Vol. 22.No. 7. P. 2233–2247.
9. Saini P.K., Yadav R.K., Yadav G.C. Green manures in agriculture: A review // BhartiyaKrishiAnusandhanPatrika. 2019. Vol. 34. No.1. P. 1‒10.URL: https://arccjournals.com/journal/bhartiya-krishi-anusandhan-patrika/BKAP142 (дата обращения: 05.09.2023).
10. Differentiation of charcoal, soot and diagenetic carbon in soil: Method comparison and perspectives / P.J.Roth, E.Lehndorff, S.Brodowski,et al. // Org. Geochem. Pergamon. 2012. Vol. 46. P. 66–75.
11. ГОСТ Р ИСО 27085-2012 Корма для животных. Определения содержания кальция, натрия, фосфора, магния, калия, железа, цинка, меди, марганца, кобальта, молибдена, мышьяка, свинца и кадмия методом ИСП-АЭС (Переиздание). М.: Стандартинформ, 2012. 28с.
12. ISO 13320:2009 Particle size analysis ‒ Laser diffraction methods ISO Standards, 2009.51p.
13. Is the Laser Diffraction Method Reliable for Soil Particle Size Distribution Analysis? / Y.Yang, L.Wang, O.Wendroth,et al. // Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2019. Vol. 83.No. 2. P. 276–287.
14. A new optical leaf-clip meter for simultaneous non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids / Z.G.Cerovic, G.Masdoumier, N. BenGhozlen,et al. // Physiol. Plant. 2012. Vol. 146.No. 3. P. 251–260.
15. ISO 16072. Soil quality-Laboratory methods for determination of microbial respiration ISO Standards, 2002.19p.
16. Ларикова Ю.С., Волобуева О.Г. Современные представления об эколого-физиологической роли корневых экссудатов растений // Зернобобовые и крупяные культуры. 2021. № 4(40). C. 94–101.
17. Relationship between fine-root exudation and respiration of two Quercus species in a Japanese temperate forest / L.Sun, M.Ataka, Y.Kominami,et al. // Tree Physiol. 2017. Vol. 37.No. 8. P. 1011–1020.
1. Mbow C, Rosenzweig C, Barioni LG. Food security. Germany, Potsdam: Institut fur Klimafolgenforschung. 2019; 550 p.
2. Lynch J, Cain M, Frame D. Agriculture’s contribution to climate change and role in mitigation is distinct from predominantly Fossil CO2-Emitting Sectors. [Internet]. Front. Sustain. FoodSyst. 2021. [cited 2023, September 05]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039/full.
3. Safin RI, Valiev AR, Kolesar VA. [Current state and prospects of carbon farming development in the Republic of Tatarstan]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2021; Vol.16. 3(63). 7-13 p.
4. [On approval of the list of greenhouse gases in respect of which state accounting of greenhouse gas emissions and maintenance of the greenhouse gas cadastre is carried out]. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 22.10.2021 № 2979-r. Ros. gaz. 2021. 7 iyulya.
5. Phillips CL, Nickerson N. Soil respiration reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences: monograph. Denmark: Elsevier. 2015; 20 p.
6. Jayawardena DM, Heckathorn SA, Boldt JK. A meta-analysis of the combined effects of elevated carbon dioxide and chronic warming on plant %N, protein content and N-uptake rate. [Internet]. AoB Plants. 2021 [cited 2023, September 05]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/aobpla/article/13/4/plab031/6284301.
7. Valizadeh N, Jalilian S, Hallaj Z. Encouraging adoption of green manure technology to produce clean rice product. [Internet]. Sci. Rep. 2023. [cited 2023, September 05]. Available from: http://www.voennoepravo.ru/node/2149.
8. Gao S, Li S, Zhou G. The potential of green manure to increase soil carbon sequestration and reduce the yield - scaled carbon footprint of rice production in southern China. [Internet]. J. Integr. Agric. 2022; Vol.22. 7. 2233-2247 p.
9. Saini PK, Yadav RK, Yadav GC. Green manures in agriculture: a review. [Internet]. BhartiyaKrishiAnusandhanPatrika. 2019; Vol.34. 1. 1-10 p. [cited 2023, September 05]. Available from: https://arccjournals.com/journal/bhartiya - krishi-anusandhan-patrika/BKAP142.
10. Roth PJ, Lehndorff E, Brodowski S. Differentiation of charcoal, soot and diagenetic carbon in soil: Method comparison and perspectives. Org. Geochem. Pergamon. 2012; Vol.46. 66-75 p.
11. GOST R ISO 27085-2012 Korma dlya zhivotnykh. Opredeleniya soderzhaniya kal'tsiya, natriya, fosfora, magniya, kaliya, zheleza, tsinka, medi, margantsa, kobal'ta, molibdena, mysh'yaka, svintsa i kadmiya metodom ISP-AES. [Animal feed. Determination of the content of calcium, sodium, phosphorus, magnesium, potassium, iron, zinc, copper, manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, arsenic, lead and cadmium by ICP-AES]. Moscow: Standartinform. 2012; 28 p.
12. ISO 13320: 2009 Particle size analysis ‒ Laser diffraction methods ISO Standards. 2009; 51p.
13. Yang Y, Wang L, Wendroth O. Is the laser diffraction method reliable for soil particle size distribution analysis? Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2019; Vol.83. 2. 276-287 p.
14. Cerovic ZG, Masdoumier G, BenGhozlen N. A new optical leaf-clip meter for simultaneous non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids. Physiol. Plant. 2012; Vol.146. 3. 251-260 p.
15. ISO 16072. Soil quality-Laboratory methods for determination of microbial respiration ISO Standards, 2002;19 p.
16. Larikova YuS, Volobueva OG. [Modern ideas about the ecological and physiological role of plant root exudates]. Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2021; 4(40). 94-101 p.
17. Sun L, Ataka M, Kominami Y. Relationship between fine-root exudation and respiration of two Quercus species in a Japanese temperate forest. Tree Physiol. 2017; Vol.37. 8. 1011-1020 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
