SUSTAINABILITY OF AGRARIAN REGIONS DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC TURBULENCE

DOI 10.12737/207304622024119127 УДК 332.14

Authors

  • Marat Rashitovich Safiullin Kazan (Volga) Federal University, Kazan, Russia State National Budgetary Institution Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan”, Kazan, Russia
  • Rafis Timerkhanovich Burganov Volga State University of Physical Education, Sports and Tourism, Kazan, Russia
  • Almaz Minvazykhovich Mingulov Center for advanced economic research of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, Russia.

Keywords:

agroindustrial regions, food security, shock resistance, export dependence, import dependence, recovery efficiency, systemic transformations

Abstract

The increasing sanctions attacks, the transformation of foreign economic supply chains, and restrictions on access to global financial markets have a significant impact on the parameters of sustainable development of the national economy and its regions. At the same time, these processes, which belong to the category of macroeconomic external shocks, manifest themselves very heterogeneously in the context of the regional economic systems of the Russian Federation, which have different potential for resistance and adaptation to new conditions. Of particular interest is the potential for shock resistance (resilience) of regions with agricultural specialization, which form the potential for food security of the country and determine the key frontiers of the quality of life of the population. The novelty of the study is the proposed three-dimensional model, which assumes the need to study the processes under study through the prism of the manifestation of three key components (indicators). The first one characterizes the readiness of the research object for systemic transformations (Res_eff), and the two following ones (export dependence and import dependence) (Res_uyazv), combined into a single, aggregated indicator, form the potential for assessing the vulnerability of regions in the context of the transformation of foreign economic relations. The ratio of these indicators to each other determines the value of the integral indicator of the shock resistance of the region. Based on the developed methodological tools, as well as relying on descriptive data analysis methods to identify regions of Volga Federal District with an increased level of agro-industrial specialization, two regional groups with similar characteristics of aggregated resistance were identified. The first group, with a moderate level of shock resistance, included the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Republic of Tatarstan. These entities are characterized by an increased risk of sustainable development in the context of sanctions attacks. The second group with a high level of resistance (Res ≥2) included Saratov, Penza and Orenburg regions, forming the framework of agricultural subjects of Volga Federal District with the highest level of shock resistance.

Information about the authors

Marat Rashitovich Safiullin , Kazan (Volga) Federal University, Kazan, Russia State National Budgetary Institution Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan”, Kazan, Russia

Doctor of Economics, ViceRector for Economic and Strategic Development, VicePresident of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan

Rafis Timerkhanovich Burganov , Volga State University of Physical Education, Sports and Tourism, Kazan, Russia

Doctor of Economics, Rector

Almaz Minvazykhovich Mingulov , Center for advanced economic research of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, Russia.

Аcting head of the executive committee of Aksubaevskiy municipal district, postgraduate student

References

 1. Гранберг, А.Г. Основы региональной экономики М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2001. 471с.

 2. Тюнен, И. Изолированное государство. М.: Экономическая жизнь, 1926. 326с.

 3. Christaller, W. The central locations in southern Germany [Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland]. Darmstadt: wbg academic, 2009. 342p.

 4. Foster K.A. A Case Study Approach to Understanding Regional Resilience / Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, Working Paper 200708. 2007. 41 p. URL: https://www.econstor.eu/obitstream/10419/59413/1/592535347.pdf (дата обращения: 12.12.2023).

 5. Hill E.W., Wial H., Wolman H. Exploring Regional Economic Resilience / Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, Working Paper 200804. 2008. 15 p. https://doi. org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5099.4000

 6. Климанов В.В., Казакова С.М., Михайлова А.А. Ретроспективный анализ устойчивости регионов России как социальноэкономических систем // Вопросы экономики. 2019. № 5. С. 4664. https://doi.org/10.32609/00428736-2019 4664

 7. Kolomak E. Economic Effects of PandemicRelated Restrictions in Russia and their Spatial Heterogeneity // R Economy. 2020. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 154161. https://doi.org/10.15826/ recon.2020.6.3.013

 8. Малкина М.Ю. Оценка устойчивости развития региональных экономик на основе расстояний Махаланобиса // Terra Economicus. 2020. Т. 18. № 3. С. 140159. https:// doi.org/10.18522/20736606202018 140159

 9. Карпова О. И. Оценка экспортного потенциала аграрного сектора экономики региона / О. И. Карпова // Региональная экономика: теория и практика. 2022. Т. 20, № 11(506). С. 21422159.

 10. Svanidze M., Götz L. Spatial Market Efficiency of Grain Markets in Russia: Implications of High Trade Costs for Export Potential. Global Food Security, 2019, vol. 21, pp. 6068. DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.07.004

 11. Gorbunov S.I., Sukhanova I.F., Lyavina M.Y. Development Prospects of the Food Export Potential of Russia in Terms of Import Substitution. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018, sp. iss. 3, pp. 115120. DOI:10.32861/jssr.spi3.115.120.

 12. Регионы России. Социальноэкономические показатели, 2023г. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Region_Pokaz_2023.pdf (Дата обращения: 17.04.2024)

 13. Таможенная статистика Приволжского таможенного управления. URL: https://ptu.customs.gov.ru/folder/146699 (Дата обращения: 15.04.2024).

 14. ЕМИСС. Расходы консолидированного бюджета субъекта РФ и территориального государственного внебюджетного фонда, исполнено. URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/58441 (дата обращения 05.02.2024)

 1. Granberg AG. Osnovy regionalnoy ekonomiki. [Fundamentals of regional economics]. Moscow: GU VShE. 2001; 471p.

 2. Tyunen I. Izolirovannoe gosudarstvo. [Isolated state]. Moscow: Ekonomicheskaya zhizn. 1926; 326 p.

 3. Christaller W. The central locations in southern Germany. [Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland]. Darmstadt: wbg academic. 2009; 342p.

 4. Foster KA. A case study approach to understanding regional resilience. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, working paper 200708. 2007; 41 p. [cited 2023, December 12]. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/obitstream/10419/59413/1/592535347.pdf.

 5. Hill EW, Wial H, Wolman H. Exploring regional economic resilience. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley, Working Paper 200804. 2008; 15 p. https://doi. org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5099.4000

 6. Klimanov VV, Kazakova SM, Mikhaylova AA. [Retrospective analysis of the sustainability of Russian regions as social and economic systems]. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2019; 5. 4664 p. https://doi.org/10.32609/004287362019 4664

 7. Kolomak E. Economic effects of pandemicrelated restrictions in Russia and their spatial heterogeneity. REconomy. 2020; Vol.6. 3. 154161 p. https://doi.org/10.15826/ recon.2020.6.3.013

 8. Malkina MYu. [Assessing the sustainability of regional economic development based on Mahalanobis distances]. Terra Economicus. 2020; Vol.18. 3. 140159 p. https:// doi.org/10.18522/20736606202018 140159

 9. Karpova OI. [Assessment of the export potential of the agricultural sector of the regional economy]. Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2022; Vol.20. 11(506). 21422159 p.

 10. Svanidze M, Gotz L. Spatial market efficiency of grain markets in Russia: Implications of high trade costs for export potential. Global Food Security. 2019; Vol.21. 6068 p. DOI:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.07.004

 11. Gorbunov SI, Sukhanova IF, Lyavina MY. Development prospects of the food export potential of Russia in terms of import substitution. The Journal of social sciences research. 2018; sp. iss. 3, 115120 p. DOI: 10.32861/jssr.spi3.115.120.

 12. Regions of Russia. Social and economic indicators 2023. [Internet]. [cited 2024, April 17]. Available from: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Region_Pokaz_2023.pdf

 13. Customs statistics of the Volga Customs Administration. [Internet]. [cited 2024, April 15]. Available from: https://ptu.customs.gov.ru/folder/146699.

 14. EMISS. Expenditures of the consolidated budget of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation and the territorial state extrabudgetary fund, executed. [Internet]. [cited 2024, February 05]. Available from: https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/58441

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Safiullin М. Р., Burganov Р. Т., & Mingulov А. М. (2026). SUSTAINABILITY OF AGRARIAN REGIONS DEVELOPMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC TURBULENCE: DOI 10.12737/207304622024119127 УДК 332.14. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 19(4). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/136