METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR CONTROL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT OF STATE SUPPORT MEASURES FOR FISHERY ORGANISATIONS

DOI 10.12737/20730462202495102 УДК 338

Authors

  • Irina Fedorovna Vetrova Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
  • Margarita Viktorovna Melnik Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Keywords:

state support, control, effectiveness, efficiency, information and analytical support for control, end toend, strategic, final contro

Abstract

The measures of State Program "Fishery complex development" and Federal Project "Modernization and stimulation of fishery complex development" [1] are aimed at developing the fishery complexes by upgrading the fishing fleet, equipped with the necessary equipment for catching and processing fish, forming the infrastructure and social conditions for its functioning. At the same time, the analysis of dynamics of financial support volume of the State Program "Fishery complex Development" from 2022 to 2026 shows that its growth rate is variable: the smallest amount of budget funds was allocated in 2023 (growth rate was 84%), the largest amount is planned for 2025 (growth rate 134%). The growth rate of financial support of the Federal Project "Modernization and stimulation of fishery complex development" was 19% in 2023, 68% in 2024, in 2025 it will be 116%, and in 2026 it is planned to decrease to 107%. This situation is explained by the limited budgetary resources, in which the key issue is always the assessment of the priority of measures for which specific state support is allocated. Equipping economic entities of the fishery complex with new modern vessels, equipped with the necessary equipment for catching and processing of fish, requires substantial capital investments and a long period of time. The methods of analysis and control currently used to assess the effectiveness and priority of state support projects do not allow to fully assess their payback period and the possibility of creating value for consumers. Within the framework of the research, financial and economic modelling in combination with functional cost analysis is proposed to assess the effectiveness of the mechanism of investment quotas under the conventional name "quotas under the keel". The construction of a financial and economic model of an investment project for the acquisition or construction of a ship makes it possible to design a long-term forecast of the development of efficiency of both an individual economic entity and the industry as a whole, allowing for strategic control of the project implementation, and the use of functional cost analysis to search for reserves to reduce production costs and thus to respond to external challenges and threats in a timely manner at the expense of internal resources.

Information about the authors

Irina Fedorovna Vetrova , Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of the Audit and Corporate Reporting Department of the Faculty of Taxes, Audit and Business Analysis, Chief Researcher of the Centre for Scientific Research and Strategic Consulting of the Faculty of Taxes, Audit and Business Analysis

Margarita Viktorovna Melnik , Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor of the Department of Audit and Corporate Reporting of the Faculty of Taxes, Audit and Business Analysis, Chief Scientific Associate of the Centre for Scientific Research and Strategic Consulting of the Faculty of Taxes, Audit and Business Analysis

References

 1. Постановление Правительства РФ от 15.04.2014 № 314 (ред. от 27.05.2024) Об утверждении государственной программы Российской Федерации Развитие рыбохозяйственного комплекса

 2. Указ Президента РФ от 02.07.2021 N 400 «О Стратегии национальной безопасности Российской Федерации». URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_389271/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2024).

 3. Указ Президента РФ от 13.05.2017 N 208 «О Стратегии экономической безопасности Российской Федерации на период до 2030 года». URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_216629/ (дата обращения: 15.03.2024).

 4. Виткалова С.О. Государственная поддержка как инструментповышения эффективности производства продукции свиноводстваи обеспечения конкурентоспособности агропромышленных формирований холдингового типа // Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий. 2024.№ 9 С. 4652.

 5. Мельник М. В., Сидорова М. И., Велиханов М. Т. Систематизация организационно методического обеспечения механизмов государственной поддержки предприятий обороннопромышленного комплекса // Проблемы экономики и юридической практики. 2023. Т. 19. № 5. С. 196206.

 6. Самыгин Д.Ю., Иванов А.А., Носов А.В. Нормативное планирование господдержки товаропроизводителей для обеспечения физической и экономической доступности продукции // Вестник Воронежского государственного аграрного университета. 2024. Т. 17. № 3(82). С. 197208. https//:doi.org/ 10.53914/issn20712243_2024_3_197208.

 7. Пласкова Н.С. Теория и практика стратегического экономического анализа результативности бизнеса: монография / Н.С. Пласкова. Москва: МАКС Пресс, 2007. 363 с.

 8. Булыга Р. П., Мельник М. В., Сафонова И. В. Проблемы финансовых измерений экологических и социальных факторов в публичной отчетности компаний // Вестник Воронежского государственного аграрного университета. 2022. Т. 15. № 3(74). С. 202218.

 9. Ветрова И. Ф. Стратегический контроль эффективности мер государственной поддержки обороннопромышленного комплекса в условиях санкционных ограничений // Учет. Анализ. Аудит. 2023.Т.10.№ 5.С.6171.

 10. Орехова Е. Госпрограмма рыбохозяйственного комплекса в 2025-2027 годы предварительно потребует 60,5 млрд рублей из бюджета. АгроЭксперт. URL: https://t.me/agroexpert_press

 11. Ласоцкая О. В., Пузыревская А. А. Сущность метода попарного анализа и метода расстановки приоритетов в функциональностоимостном анализе // Science Time. 2021. № 5(89). С. 99101.

 12. Seisenbayeva A. M., Imramziyeva M. Y., Maukenova A. A. The impact of state support on the innovative activities of small and medium businesses in Kazakhstan // Экономическая серия Вестника ЕНУ им. Л.Н. Гумилева. 2023.(I)YS()No. 3. P. 279290.

 13. Функциональностоимостный анализ издержек производства / Б.И. Майданчик, М.Г. Карпунин, Н.К. Моисеева [и др.]. Москва: Финансы и статистика, 1985. 270 с.

 14. Бердиева О. Г., Реджепова А. С., Ходжаев Р. К. Функциональностоимостный анализ: эффективность и инновации в экономическом анализе // Вестник науки. 2024. Т. 1. № 2(71). С. 1215.

 15. Miles L. D. Как снижать издержки с помощью стоимостного анализа (англ.) = How to Cut Costs with Value Analysis // A Special American Machinist Report to The Metalworking Industries: журнал. N.Y.:McGrawHill, 1949.

 16. Дворецкий В.И. Методы проведения и организация функциональностоимостного анализа / В.И. Дворецкий, Б.И. Майданчик. Москва: ЦНИИ информ. и техн. экон. исслед. приборостроения, средств автоматизации и систем управления, 1984. 43 с.

 1. Postanovlenie Pravitelstva RF ot 15.04.2014 № 314 (red. ot 27.05.2024) Ob utverzhdenii gosudarstvennoy programmy Rossiiskoy Federatsii Razvitie rybokhozyaystvennogo kompleksa". [Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation of 15.04.2014 No. 314 (as amended on 27.05.2024) On approval of the state program of the Russian Federation Development of the fisheries complex"].

 2. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 02.07.2021 No.400 On the national security strategy of the Russian Federation". [Internet]. Konsultant. [cited 2024, March 15]. Available from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_389271/.

 3. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 13.05.2017 No.208 On the economic security strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030". [Internet]. Konsultant. [cited 2024, March 15]. Available from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_216629/.

 4. Vitkalova SO. [State support as a tool for increasing the efficiency of pig production and ensuring the competitiveness of holdingtype agroindustrial formations]. Ekonomika selskokhozyaystvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatiy. 2024; 9. 46 52 p.

 5. Melnik MV, Sidorova MI, Velikhanov MT. [Systematization of organizational and methodological support for mechanisms of state support for enterprises of the defenseindustry complex]. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki. 2023; Vol.19. 5. 196206 p.

 6. Samugin DYu, Ivanov AA, Nosov AV. [Regulatory planning of state support for commodity producers to ensure physical and economic availability of products]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2024; Vol.17. 3(82). 197208 p. https//:doi.org/ 10.53914/issn20712243_2024_3_197208.

 7. Plaskova NS. Teoriya i praktika strategicheskogo ekonomicheskogo analiza rezultativnosti biznesa: monografiya. [Theory and practice of strategic economic analysis of business performance: monograph]. Moscow: MAKS Press. 2007; 363 p.

 8. Bulyga RP, Melnik MV, Safonova IV. [Problems of financial measurements of environmental and social factors in public reporting of companies]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022; Vol.15. 3(74). 202218 p.

 9. Vetrova IF. [Strategic control of the effectiveness of state support measures for the defenseindustry complex in the context of sanctions restrictions]. Uchet. Analiz. Audit. 2023; Vol.10. 5. 6171 p.

 10. Orekhova E. [The state program of the fisheries complex in 20252027 will preliminarily require 60.5 billion rubles from the budget]. AgroEkspert. Available from: https://t.me/agroexpert_press

 11. Lasotskaya OV, Puzurevskaya AA. [The essence of the pairwise analysis method and the prioritization method in functional cost analysis]. Science Time. 2021; 5(89). 99101 p.

 12. Seysenbayeva AM, Imramzieva MY, Maukenova AA. The impact of state support on the innovative activities of small and medium businesses in Kazakhstan. Ekonomicheskaya seriya Vestnika ENU im.L.N.Gumileva. 2023; 3. 279290

 13. Maydanchik BI, Karpunin MG, Moiseeva NK. Funktsionalnostoimostnuy analiz izderzhek proizvodstva. [Functional cost analysis of production costs]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika. 1985; 270 p.

 14. Berdieva OG, Redzhepova AS, Khodzhaev RK. [Functional cost analysis: efficiency and innovation in economic analysis]. Vestnik nauki. 2024; Vol.1. 2(71). 1215 p.

 15. Miles LD. How to cut costs with value analysis. A special American machinist report to the metalworking industries: magazine. New York: McGrawHill. 1949.

 16. Dvoretskiy VI, Maydanchik BI. Metody provedeniya i organizatsiya funktsionalnostoimostnogo analiza. [Methods of conducting and organizing functional cost analysis]. Moscow: TsNII inform. i tekhn.ekon. issled. priborostroeniya, sredstv avtomatizatsii i sistem upravleniya. 1984; 43 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Vetrova . И. Ф., & Melnik М. В. . (2026). METHODOLOGICAL TOOLS FOR CONTROL AND ANALYTICAL SUPPORT OF STATE SUPPORT MEASURES FOR FISHERY ORGANISATIONS: DOI 10.12737/20730462202495102 УДК 338. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 19(4). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/133

Issue

Vol. 19 No. 4 (2024): Vestnik Kazan SAU № 4 (76) 2024

Section

ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ

Categories

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Vestnik of Kazan state agrarian university

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Метаданные научных статей, включая название, аннотацию, сведения об авторах, список литературы, идентификаторы и иные элементы библиографического описания для дальнейшего неограниченного использования, передаются в редакцию с правом их неограниченного использования на условиях открытой лицензии Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).