INFLUENCE OF ZEOLITE AND METALLOCENE ON PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF POTATOE

DOI 10.12737/2073046220246469 УДК 631.8

Authors

  • Elena Aleksandrovnа Prischepenko Federal State Budgetary Institution of the Administration Privolzhskmeliovodkhoz”, Kazan, Russia
  • Mars Mansurovich Khismatullin Federal State Budgetary Institution of the Administration Privolzhskmeliovodkhoz”, Kazan, Russia
  • Gulnara Fanisovnа Rakhmanova Federal Research Center of Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia

Keywords:

potato (Solanum tuberosum), yield, zeolite, mineral fertilizers, processing, variety, buddin

Abstract

The studies were conducted to study the effect of zeolite and metallocene (Cu) together with mineral fertilizers on productivity and quality of potatoes of domestic and foreign varieties. The work was carried out in 2020-2021 in the Republic of Tatarstan on gray forest heavy loamy soil, which was characterized by the following agrochemical indicators: humus 3.2%, рНKCl 6.8 units, H 0.7 mgeq/100 g, S 23.12 mgeq/100 g, alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen 84.0 mg/kg, Р2О5 and K2O (according to Kirsanov) ‒ 143 and 107 mg/kg, respectively. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used in the study. The total area of the experimental plot was 74.7 m2, the accounting one was 35 m2. The experimental design included a variant without fertilizer application (control), three backgrounds of mineral fertilizers (N100P120K120, N120P140K140, N140P170K170) with the addition of zeolite at a dose of 5 t/ha, metallocene (Cu) at a dose of 2 l/ha as foliar feeding in the budding phase, or a combination of these. The combined use of N140P170K170, zeolite and metallocene (Cu) provided the maximum increase in the yield of the domestic potato variety Salsa to 28.84 t/ha, and the foreign variety Arosa to 26.04 t/ha, or 2.2 and 1.8 times, respectively, compared to the control. At the same time, the starch content increased from 21.1% to 23.2% and from 21.6% to 25.2%, respectively, dry matter from 13.9% to 16.0% and from 14.4% to 18.0%.

Information about the authors

Elena Aleksandrovnа Prischepenko , Federal State Budgetary Institution of the Administration Privolzhskmeliovodkhoz”, Kazan, Russia

Doctor of Agricultural sciences, director

Mars Mansurovich Khismatullin , Federal State Budgetary Institution of the Administration Privolzhskmeliovodkhoz”, Kazan, Russia

Doctor of Agricultural sciences, director

Gulnara Fanisovnа Rakhmanova , Federal Research Center of Kazan Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia

Ph.D. of Agricultural sciences, senior researcher of the laboratory of Molecular genetic and microbiological method

References

 1. Обоснование и определение параметров бороздообразователя картофелесажалки / М. Н. Калимуллин, Д. Т. Халиуллин, И. Х. Гайфуллин, Р. Р. Хамитов // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. 2022. Т. 17. № 3(67). . 8489. doi: 10.12737/2073046220228489.

 2. Gearan E. C., Fox M. K. Updated Nutrition Standards Have Significantly Improved the Nutritional Quality of School Lunches and Breakfasts // Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2020. Vol. 120. No. 3. P. 363‒370

 3. The potato and its contribution to the human diet and health / G. Burgos, T. Zum Felde, C. Andre, et al. // The Potato Crop. ChamSwitzerland): Springer, 2020. . 37‒74.

 4. Действие органических и минеральных удобрений и их сочетание при внесении под картофель на черноземах Закамья Республики Татарстан / Ф. Ш. Шайхутдинов, И. М. Сержанов, Р. И. Гараев [и др.] // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. 2024. Т. 19. № 2(74). . 3943. doi: 10.12737/2073046220243943.

 5. Variation and genetic basis of mineral content in potato tubers and prospects for genomic selection / J. Pandey, S. Gautam, D. C. Scheuring, et al. // Front Plant Sci. 2023. Vol. 14. . 1‒14. URL: https://wwwfrontiersinorg journalsplantsciencearticles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1301297/full. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1301297 (дата обращения: 18.07.2024)

 6. Lindstrom K., Mousavi S. A. Effectiveness of nitrogen fixation in rhizobia // Microb Biotechnology. 2020. Vol. 13. No. 5. P. 13141335.

 7. MineralEcological Cropping SystemsA New Approach to Improve Ecosystem Services by Farming without Chemical Synthetic Plant Protection / B. Zimmermann, I. ClaßMahler, M. Cossel, et al. // Agronomy. 2021. Vol. 11. P. 1710. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/20734395/11/9/1710(дата обращения: 18.07. 2024). doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091710

 8. Вакуленко В.В. Регуляторы роста растений повышают стрессоустойчивость культур // Защита и карантин растений. 2015. № 2. C 1314.

 9. Байбеков Р.Ф., Коваленко А.А., Забугина Т.М. Эффективность систем удобрения картофеля на дерновоподзолистой почве разной степени окультуренности // Земледелие. 2021. 8. С. 2327.

 10. Роль сорта и защитных мероприятий при возделывании картофеля в Зауралье / В. А. Задворнев, И. Н. Порсев, В. В. Половникова и др. // Вестник Курганской ГСХА. 2022. № 1 (41). С. 12‒18.

 11. Плотников А.А., Иванчик В.А. Влияние применения различных доз минеральных удобрений на урожайность и качество клубней картофеля на дерновоподзолистых легкосуглинистых почвах Костромской области // Достижения науки и техники АПК. 2020. Т. 34. 5. С. 3336.

 12. Чагин В.В., Чагин В.В. Влияние удобрений на продуктивность, качество и сохранность картофеля в период хранения в степной зоне Хакасии // Земледелие. 2022. 1. С. 2325.

 13. Захарова М. Н., Рожкова Л. В., Ушакова Е. Ю. Влияние доз минеральных удобрений и сроков скашивания ботвы на выход семенного картофеля // Вестник российской сельскохозяйственной науки. 2020. № 4. С. 58‒60.

 14. Куликова А. Х. Влияние цеолита и удобрений на его основе на урожайность кукурузы и баланс элементов питания в черноземе выщелоченном под ее посевами / А. Х. Куликова, А. В. Карпов, М. С. Черкасов // Вестник Ульяновской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2023. № 2(62). С. 6975. doi: 10.18286/181645012023 6975

 15. Эффективность цеолита и цеолита, обогащенного аминокислотами, в качестве удобрения проса / А. Х. Куликова, Е. А. Яшин, А. С. Ромашкин, А. В. Козлов // Вестник Ульяновской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии. 2022. № 3(59). . 7682. doi: 10.18286/181645012022 7682.

 16. Ramesh K., Reddy D. D. Chapter four zeolites and their potential uses in agriculture // Advances in Agronomy. D. L. Sparks, Academic Press. 2011. Vol. 113. No. 2. P. 219241.

 17. Борисов В. А. Применение цеолитов в овощеводстве // Картофель и овощи.2019.№ 8(112).С.110149.

 18. Сравнительная оценка сортов среднераннего картофеля, выращенного в условиях Юга Тюменской области / Н. О. Ренев, М. В. Ренева, Е. С. Родина и др. // Агропродовольственная политика России. 2024. № 1(109). С. 44‒52.

 19. Эффективность нового медьсодержащего фунгицида против возбудителя фитофтороза картофеля / С.Н. Нековаль, А.В. Беляева, А.Е. Садовая и др.// Достижения науки и техники АПК.2020.Т.34.№11.С.4852

 1. Kalimullin MN, Khaliullin DT, Gayfullin IKh, Khamitov RR. [Justification and determination of the parameters of the furrow former of the potato planter]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022; Vol.17. 3(67). 8489 p. doi: 10.12737/2073046220228489.

 2. Gearan EC, Fox MK. Updated nutrition standards have significantly improved the nutritional quality of school lunches and breakfasts. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2020; Vol.120. 3. 363370 p.

 3. Burgos G, Zum Felde T, Andre C. The potato and its contribution to the human diet and health. The Potato Crop. Cham (Switzerland): Springer. 2020; 3774 p.

 4. Shaykhutdinov FSh, Serzhanov IM, Garaev RI. [The effect of organic and mineral fertilizers and their combination when applied to potatoes on chernozems of Kama region of the Republic of Tatarstan]. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2024; Vol.19. 2(74). 3943 p. doi: 10.12737/2073046220243943.

 5. Pandey J, Gautam S, Scheuring DC. Variation and genetic basis of mineral content in potato tubers and prospects for genomic selection. [Internet]. Front Plant Sci. 2023; Vol.14. 114 p. [cited 2024, July 18]. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plantscience/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1301297/full. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1301297.

 6. Lindstrom K, Mousavi SA. Effectiveness of nitrogen fixation in rhizobia. Microb Biotechnology. 2020; Vol.13. 5. 13141335 p.

 7. Zimmermann B, ClaßMahler I, Cossel M. Mineral ecological cropping systemsa new approach to improve ecosystem services by farming without chemical synthetic plant protection. [Internet]. Agronomy. 2021; Vol.11. 1710 p. [cited 2024, July 18]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/20734395/11/9/1710. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11091710.

 8. Vakulenko VV. [Plant growth regulators increase crop stress resistance]. Zashchita i karantin rasteniy. 2015; 2.1314 p.

 9. Baybekov RF, Kovalenko AA, Zabugina TM. [Efficiency of potato fertilization systems on sodpodzolic soils of different degrees of cultivation]. Zemledelie. 2021; 8. 2327 p.

 10. Zadvornev VA, Porsev IN, Polovnikova VV. [The role of variety and protective measures in potato cultivation in the Urals]. Vestnik Kurganskoy GSKhA. 2022; 1 (41). 1218 p.

 11. Plotnikov AA, Ivanchik VA. [Effect of the use of different doses of mineral fertilizers on the yield and qual2020; Vol.34. 5. 3336 p.

 12. Chagin VV, Chagin VV. [The influence of fertilizers on the productivity, quality and safety of potatoes during storage in the steppe zone of Khakassia]. Zemledelie. 2022; 1. 2325 p.

 13. Zakharova MN, Rozhkova LV, Ushakova EYu. [The influence of mineral fertilizer doses and timing of tops mowing on the yield of seed potatoes]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy selskokhozyaystvennoy nauki. 2020; 4. 5860 p.

 14. Kulikova AKh, Karpov AV, Cherkasov MS. [Effect of zeolite and fertilizers based on it on corn yield and nutrient balance in leached chernozem under its crops]. Vestnik Ulyanovskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii. 2023; 2(62). 6975 p. doi: 10.18286/181645012023 6975

 15. Kulikova AKh, Yashin EA, Romashkin AS, Kozlov AV. [Efficiency of zeolite and zeolite enriched with amino acids as a fertilizer for millet]. Vestnik Ulyanovskoy gosudarstvennoy selskokhozyaystvennoy akademii. 2022; 3(59). 7682 p. doi: 10.18286/181645012022 7682.

 16. Ramesh K, Reddy DD. Chapter four zeolites and their potential uses in agriculture. Advances in Agronomy. D. L. Sparks, Academic Press. 2011; Vol.113. 2. 219241 p.

 17. Borisov VA. [Use of zeolites in vegetable growing]. Kartofel i ovoshchi. 2019; 8 (112). 110149 p.

 18. Renev NO, Reneva MV, Rodina ES. [Comparative assessment of midearly potato varieties grown in the south of Tyumen region]. Agroprodovolstvennaya politika Rossii. 2024; 1(109). 4452 p.

 19. Nekoval SN, Belyaeva AV, Sadovaya AE. [Efficiency of a new coppercontaining fungicide against the causative agent of potato late blight]. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK. 2020; Vol.34. 11. 4852 p.

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Prischepenko Е. А., Khismatullin . М. М. ., & Rakhmanova Г. Ф. (2026). INFLUENCE OF ZEOLITE AND METALLOCENE ON PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF POTATOE: DOI 10.12737/2073046220246469 УДК 631.8. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 19(4). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/128

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories