EVALUATION OF BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF HUMIC GROWTH STIMULATOR IN SOYBEAN CULTIVATION

DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2025-1-31-33 УДК 635.65:631.8

Authors

  • Natalya Vladimirovna Tyutyuma Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Astrakhan region, Russia
  • Anastasiya Nikolaevna Bondarenko Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Astrakhan region, Russia
  • Andrey Vladimirovich Tyutyuma Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Astrakhan region, Russia.

Keywords:

soybean (Glycine), stimulant, irrigation, water consumption coefficient, yield.

Abstract

The studies were conducted to determine the effectiveness of using the multifunctional humic growth stimulator Lignohumate of AM potassium brand with an increased content of fulvic acids on soybean productivity under irrigated conditions. The work was carried out in 2021-2023 on an experimental irrigated site in the north of Astrakhan region. The soil of the experimental site is light chestnut, solonetzic. The humus content in the arable layer was 0.9%, mobile phosphorus and potassium (according to Machigin) - 24.3 and 441.5 mg/kg of soil, respectively, the particle size distribution is medium loamy. The field experiment design included the following variants: no treatment (control); lignohumate of AM potassium brand at a dose of 30, 50 and 70 g/ha. Over the years of study, the average daily air temperature varied from +16.5 to +26.9 ºС. July and August were quite hot, with maximum temperatures ranging from +34.1 to +38.7 ºС. Relative air humidity was 41.6 to 47.7%. Average precipitation during the growing season varied from 12.0 to 22.7 mm. Soil temperature at a depth of 0.05 to 0.15 m ranged from 24.3 to 26.8 ºС. The maximum number of grains per plant (138.3 pcs.), the weight of grains per plant (22.3 g) and the weight of 1000 seeds (212.3 g) were noted in the variant with the preparation dose of 50 g/ha. Based on the results of a three-year study, variants with the preparation doses of 50 and 70 g/ha with a yield of 4.5 t/ha were identified by productivity.

Information about the authors

Natalya Vladimirovna Tyutyuma , Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Astrakhan region, Russia

Tyutyuma Natalya Vladimirovna – Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Director, e-mail: pniiaz@mail.ru

Anastasiya Nikolaevna Bondarenko , Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Astrakhan region, Russia

Bondarenko Anastasiya Nikolaevna – Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Head of Laboratory of Vegetable Crops Agricultural Technologies, e-mail: bondarenko-a.n@mail.ru

Andrey Vladimirovich Tyutyuma , Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Astrakhan region, Russia.

Tyutyuma Andrey Vladimirovich– Head of the Department of Mechanization and Engineering Support of Science,
e-mail: pniiaz@mail.ru
Caspian Agrarian Federal Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Astrakhan region, Russia.

References

 1. Лытов М. Н. Агроэкологическая оценка сортов и приемов возделывания орошаемой сои на повторно осваиваемых землях Волгоградского Заволжья // Известия Нижневолжского агроуниверситетского комплекса. 2023. № 2 (70). С. 191–200. doi: 10.32786/2071-9485-2023-02-22.

 2. Продуктивность сортов сои при различных режимах орошения / В. В Толоконников, Г. П. Канцер, Т.С. Кошкарова и др. // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Агрономия и животноводство. 2020. Т. 15. № 4. С. 343–352. doi: 10.22363/2312-797X‑2020-15-4-343-352.

 3. The efficiency of combined application of mineral fertilizers, inoculants in soybean growing technology, and functioning of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis under increasing nitrogen rates / S. Kalenska, N. Novytska, V. Kalenskii, et al. // Agronomy Research. 2022. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 730–750. doi: 10.15159/AR.22.075.

 4. Bednarczyk M., Pisarek I. Sustainable development for soya production based on the field research carried out at the Variety assessment experimental station of Glubczyce in the years 2015-2017 // Economic and Environmental Studies. 2020. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 1219–1234. doi: 10.25167/ees.2018.48.3.

 5. Крылова Т. С., Дубровин А. Н., Дорожкина Л. А. Эффективность почвенных гербицидов и их смесей в посевах сои в условиях Амурской области // Земледелие. 2020. № 4. С. 33–36. doi:10.24411/0044-3913-2020-10409.

 6. Применение современных стимуляторов роста при возделывании зернобобовых культур: гороха, нута, сои / В. Г. Васин, А. В. Васин, О. В. Вершинина, и др. // Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2018. Т. 20. № 2 (2). С. 339–343.

 7. Early, medium and late maturing varieties of soybean as a catch crop for irrigated conditions of Uzbekistan / A. I. Nurbekov, L. Khalilova, F. Namozov, et al. // European science review. Section 4. Agricultural sciences. 2021. P. 30–34. doi: 10.29013/ESR-21-11.12-30-34.

 8. Agronomic efficiency of Bradyrhizobium pre-inoculation in association with chemical treatment of soybean seeds / K. Silva, E. Edmilson, E. Cunha, et al. // African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2018. No. 13. P. 726–732. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2018.13016

 1. Lytov MN. [Agroecological assessment of varieties and cultivation methods of irrigated soybeans on reclaimed lands of Volgograd Volga region]. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa. 2023; 2 (70). 191-200 p. doi: 10.32786/2071-9485-2023-02-22.

 2. Tolokonnikov VV, Kantser GP, Koshkarova TS. [Productivity of soybean varieties under different irrigation regimes]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Agronomiya i zhivotnovodstvo. 2020; Vol.15. 4. 343-352 p. doi: 10.22363/2312-797X 2020-15-4-343-352.

 3. Kalenska S, Novytska N, Kalenskii V. The efficiency of combined application of mineral fertilizers, inoculants in soybean growing technology, and functioning of nitrogen-fixing symbiosis under increasing nitrogen rates. Agronomy Research. 2022; Vol.20. No.4. 730-750 p. doi: 10.15159/AR.22.075.

 4. Bednarczyk M, Pisarek I. Sustainable development for soya production based on the field research carried out at the variety assessment experimental station of Glubczyce in the years 2015-2017. Economic and Environmental Studies. 2020; Vol.18. No.4. 1219-1234 p. doi: 10.25167/ees.2018.48.3.

 5. Krylova TS, Dubrovin AN, Dorozhkina LA. [Efficiency of soil herbicides and their mixtures in soybean crops in Amur region]. Zemledelie. 2020; 4. 33-36 p. doi:10.24411/0044-3913-2020-10409.

 6. Vasin VG, Vasin AV, Vershinina OV. [Use of modern growth stimulants in the leguminous crops cultivation: peas, chickpeas, soybeans]. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2018; Vol.20. 2 (2). 339-343 p.

 7. Nurbekov AI, Khalilova L, Namozov F. Early, medium and late maturing varieties of soybean as a catch crop for irrigated conditions of Uzbekistan. European science review. Section 4. Agricultural sciences. 2021; 30-34 p. doi: 10.29013/ESR-21-11.12-30-34.

 8. Silva K, Edmilson E, Cunha E. Agronomic efficiency of Bradyrhizobium pre-inoculation in association with chemical treatment of soybean seeds. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2018; No.13. 726-732 p. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2018.13016

Published

2026-07-23

How to Cite

Tyutyuma Н. В., Bondarenko А. Н., & Tyutyuma А. В. . (2026). EVALUATION OF BIOLOGICAL EFFICIENCY OF HUMIC GROWTH STIMULATOR IN SOYBEAN CULTIVATION: DOI 10.12737/2073-0462-2025-1-31-33 УДК 635.65:631.8. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, 20(1). Retrieved from http://vestnik-kazgau.ru/index.php/vestnik/article/view/104

Issue

Section

СЕЛЬСКОХОЗЯЙСТВЕННЫЕ НАУКИ

Categories